simonmar:
> dons:
> > No. They are perfect. I've stress tested them today :p
> >
> > +-+++
> > | HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstrap |
> > +-++
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > However, the definition of bracket relies on block and
> > unblock, which have the
> > following types:
> > > bracket :: IO a -> (a -> IO b) -> (a -> IO c) -> IO c
> > > block :: IO a -> IO a
> > > unblock :: IO a -> IO a
> >
> > T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 04 September 2003 01:45, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> I did something very slightly incorrect, I think, though I don't
> know what it was, because I got a working cross-port to freebsd
> yesterday, on a box that had previously given me the
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >
> > Would anything prevent block, unblock, bracket (and other similar
> > functions working on IO actions) from being generalized to all
> > intances of MonadIO?
>
> I'm afraid I can't see a way to generalise the types of block
Title: Chipworks' Webinars
Dedicated
to positioning your technology for co
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >
> > In light of this, I might amend the instructions to recommend using
> > hc-build even for an unregisterised bootstrap, because
> copying across
> > the .hi files isn't guaranteed to work when cross-compiling (I'm not
> > c
> Of course, alpha didn't build anyway due to the lack of memory
> allocation (I think) code for generic 64-bit platforms that I
> think was
> mentioned on one of the lists recently.
You might try using the hack I added to MBlock.h for x86_64. It's
admittedly completely bogus, but it hasn't fa
rmartine:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> +-+++
> | HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstrap |
> +-+++
> | i386-*-openbsd | i3
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
>
> Could you release a (transient) ghc-6.01-unreg-hc.tar.gz ?
>
Sorry, I read the doc, and I understood the unreg (.hc) tar is built on
host
with a particular target "config.h" .
I have to build it , hence.
__
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> In light of this, I might amend the instructions to recommend using
> hc-build even for an unregisterised bootstrap, because copying across
> the .hi files isn't guaranteed to work when cross-compiling (I'm not
> certain that the .
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Simon Marlow wrote:
+-+++
| HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstrap |
+-+++
| i386-*-openbsd | i386-*-openbsd |
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:41:49AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> > | | alpha-dec-osf3 | dies on host with: |
> > | || cc1: Invalid option `ieee' |
> >
> > So all 32-bit platforms have worked or are looking good, but
> > the 64 bit
> However, the definition of bracket relies on block and
> unblock, which have the
> following types:
> > bracket :: IO a -> (a -> IO b) -> (a -> IO c) -> IO c
> > block :: IO a -> IO a
> > unblock :: IO a -> IO a
>
> This forces f to be an IO action in the above withQuery
> function. If bracke
> simonmar:
> > There's a small possibility that I've missed something out from the
> > instructions, I suppose :)
>
> No. They are perfect. I've stress tested them today :p
>
> +-+++
> | HOST| TARGET| Unre
simonmar:
> There's a small possibility that I've missed something out from the
> instructions, I suppose :)
No. They are perfect. I've stress tested them today :p
+-+++
| HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstr
> Following Donald Stewart efforts and Simon Marlow's new
> porting guide,
> I made two attempts of getting GHC working on Linux/PowerPC.
>
> I made a first attempt using cross-compiling from a Linux/i386 box. I
> followed every instruction on the guide, but the compiler was
> unusable,
> r
16 matches
Mail list logo
