On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:20:42 -
> From: Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: replacement of main
>
>
> > ok, I guess this is not something you do every day;
> > I am making a language binding for t
> Template Haskell is frightfully good and we want to get rid of cpp and
> use it instead, but there's one tiny problem, namely that for cpp it
> is possible to define variables on the command line
> (-DSIMON=MARLOW and so
> on) while with Template Haskell it doesn't seem to be. Could there be
> ok, I guess this is not something you do every day;
> I am making a language binding for the library Allegro which has some
> weird things going on. I need to make a main() in C.
>
> so I followed the manual, I export my non-main haskell entrypoint
> and call it from the C main which basically
> Simon seems to have agreed that The Right Thing is to treat bindings
> with names beginning with an underscore as if they are used w.r.t. to
> the bindings they use (they're already treated as used w.r.t. warnings
> for themselves.) With this enhancement (and the other warning fixes
> apparent
> the runtime for a set of 100 tests with different inputs where:
> 1. 751 ms
> 2. 932 ms (factor 1.24)
> 3. 3074 ms (factor 4.09)
I think we ought to be able to get that down further. Could you post
the code again? It probably should go in our benchmark suite too.
Cheers,
Simo
ok, I guess this is not something you do every day;
I am making a language binding for the library Allegro which has some
weird things going on. I need to make a main() in C.
so I followed the manual, I export my non-main haskell entrypoint
and call it from the C main which basically is copy-paste
Hi,
I have a question which came up as a result of some attempts to enforce
seperate compilation. Suppose we have two modules as follows:
-- A.hs
module A (AbstractType) where
data AbstractType = it's hidden implementation
f :: AbstractType -> String
f _ = "foo"
g :: AbstractType
g
Christian Maeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > I think the issue here is that in ghc (with -fglasgow-exts),
> > the "a" here refers to the same type variable "a" in the
> > top of the instance declaration, which has already been
> > constained, and cannot be constrained
Fergus Henderson wrote:
I think the issue here is that in ghc (with -fglasgow-exts),
the "a" here refers to the same type variable "a" in the
top of the instance declaration, which has already been
constained, and cannot be constrained again.
Is that a bug or a feature?
With Haskell 98, it is a fr
