On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:53:31PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I tried stripping /usr/lib/libwx_gtk-2.4.so.0.1.1 and libwxc-0.6.so, and
> GHCi was still able to load the wx package successfully. In fact,
> libwx_gtk appeared to be already stripped.
>
> What error messages do you get, specificall
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:59:08PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > Very strange. Is /usr/lib/libdl.so perhaps a symlink to a
> library that
> > doesn't exist? That could happen if an upgrade had gone
> wrong, perhaps.
>
> Thanks, it was a dangling symlink due to my filesystem layout. Sorry
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:27:01PM +0200, David Sabel wrote:
>
> > you can turn off let-floating by compiling without optimizations,
> > i.e. without using a -O flag or using -O0 explicitly.
> > The disadvantage is that most of all other optimizations
> > are turned off too.
>
> That is exa
> Try upgrading GHC.
Thanks, I'll try that.
Would it be too much to ask that Haddock be distributed with GHC?
Reasons for:
- GHC library docs are produced with Haddock
- GHC library docs already include Haddock interface files
- would ensure version of Haddock matches that used to produce int
> But it still won't run, because (apparently) ghci won't work with
> stripped .so files, and Debian policy is to strip them. From the
> Debian policy manual, section 10.2:
>
> All installed shared libraries should be stripped with
> strip --strip-unneeded
> (The option `--
Hello,
Does inlining work with any function definitions (including those
defined locally following a where.. say), or only with top level
function definitions?
Thanks
--
Adrian Hey
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.has
