Bayley, Alistair wrote:
I've built a small test case. When I compile with:
ghc Main.hs test.c -o Main.exe
... the (correct) output from Main.exe is:
123.0
5678901234567890
And when I compile with:
ghc -prof Main.hs test.c -o Main.exe
... the (incorrect) output from Main.exe is:
1.0
986516178
I
Hi folks,
Release candidate distributions for 6.2.2 are now available. If you
have the time, we'd really appreciate it if you could install and/or
build one of these distributions and give us feedback.
ghc-6.2.20040914 and later are 6.2.2 release candidates
Please mention the exact version n
simonmar:
> Hi folks,
>
> Release candidate distributions for 6.2.2 are now available. If you
> have the time, we'd really appreciate it if you could install and/or
> build one of these distributions and give us feedback.
>
>ghc-6.2.20040914 and later are 6.2.2 release candidates
>
> Please
Could we possibly have derived instances of Typeable and Data for
Network.URI.URI in the 6.3 CVS please?
-Si.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Thanks, including the header does fix it. I was lazy, as you can link quite
easily against a DLL without having to provide a header; just the import
decls suffice, plus -l and -L directives. I have had this problem (not using
the -I directive) in a different guise, when trying to optimise.
I've ad
On 15 September 2004 00:33, Roberto Zunino wrote:
> However, compiling with
>
>ghc -prof Main.hs test.c -#include test.h
>
> or s/-prof/-fvia-C/, works fine, provided test.h contains the correct
> function prototypes.
>
> -- test.h
> long long myInt64(void);
> double myDouble(void);
> -
> The compiler has generated intermediate code which uses a 77-tuple, but
> unfortunately the libraries don't contain code for 77-tuples (we only go
> up to 62-tuples).
>
> This is kind of a known bug, occasionally tickled by Happy-generated
> parsers.
>
> If you're not generating your parser with
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:38:43PM +0200, Sebastian Boldt wrote:
> I am a bit confused about command stacks. I tried to run the following
> code in ghc:
>
> mshowA :: (Arrow a, Show b) => a (b, String) String
> mshowA = proc (x,s) -> returnA -< s ++ show x ++ s
>
> f :: Arrow a => a Int String
>
Hi I'm trying to build for cygwin.
>From a clean windows box I
Installed cygwin to c:/cygwin
Added c:/cygwin/bin to path
Installed MSys and MinGW in c:/msys and c:/mingw (did not add path)
Installed ghc to c:/ghc/ghc-6.2.1
Untarred source to c:/ghc/ghc-6.2.1(same dir)
Copied perl from ghc
Hello,
I thought we were going to get a new FFI function soon..
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ffi/2004-March/001740.html
AFAICS it isn't in the libs for this release :-(
Has this got lost or forgotten about?
Regards
--
Adrian Hey
___
Glasgow-hask
10 matches
Mail list logo