Hi Sven,
Yes, that would be it. The change is harmless enough.
Thanks for the pointer to the message.
Greg
On Oct 23, 2004, at 3:01 PM, Sven Panne wrote:
Gregory Wright wrote:
Did the file ghc-6.2.2.tar.bz2 get changed without the version number
being
changed? The md5 sum of the files has changed,
Gregory Wright wrote:
Did the file ghc-6.2.2.tar.bz2 get changed without the version number being
changed? The md5 sum of the files has changed, breaking the darwinports
and presumably the *BSD ports builds as well.
I didn't see any notice to the list, so I'm not sure if the change is
intentional,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:17:20AM -0400, Robert Dockins wrote:
> There is a hashtable in the IO monad:
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Data.HashTable.html
Why is it in IO instead of the more general ST? IMHO _all_ mutable data
structures should be written for ST (o
Hi,
Did the file ghc-6.2.2.tar.bz2 get changed without the version number
being
changed? The md5 sum of the files has changed, breaking the darwinports
and presumably the *BSD ports builds as well.
I didn't see any notice to the list, so I'm not sure if the change is
intentional,
or if the wrong
Hello fellow Haskelleers,
I've come upon a problem that sort of bites me.
I'm writing a multithreaded webserver in which pages are dynamically
loaded haskell applications. The main server loop listens for incoming
requests and distributes these to request handlers, each running in a
separate ligh