Hi all,
I'm looking for some advice on profiling and any suggestion on what
might be going on with this program.
I'm profiling c2hs, Manuel Chakravarty's FFI preprocessor with an eye
to reducing its time and space usage. I'm also trying to add binary
serialisation.
c2hs basically works by
On 08 November 2004 18:47, Duncan Coutts wrote:
We can use ghc-pkg at the build / install-into-temp phase to create
the $(package).conf files under
$TMP_INSTALL_ROOT/usr/lib/ghc-$VER/package.conf.d/ and then final
installation is jsut merging files without any post-install calls to
ghc-pkg
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm looking for some advice on profiling and any suggestion on what
might be going on with this program.
One suggestion might be to serialise (key,value) pairs to file as
they are first encountered, rather than waiting until they are all
inside
On 09 November 2004 12:54, Duncan Coutts wrote:
[snip]
When I do time profiling, the big cost centres come up as putByte and
putWord. When I profile for space it shows the large FiniteMaps
dominating most everything else. I originally guessed from that that
the serialisation must be forcing
Dear all,
Anyone has ever tried exporting Haskell list to C array ? I read in
the FFI for MarshalAlloc, it is mentioned that Haskell lists are
typically passed as C arrays to C functions.
However, how can we do that ? I have a list of Int (i.e. [Int]) which
I would like to pass as int[] in C.
David Lo writes:
Anyone has ever tried exporting Haskell list to C array?
Check out the module Foreign.Marshal.Array, specifically the
functions:
withArray:: Storable a = [a] - (Ptr a - IO b) - IO b
withArrayLen :: Storable a = [a] - (Int - Ptr a - IO b) - IO b
These will marshal a
Good point. I've fixed this (HEAD only), and added a test so it won't
recur. Thanks!
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keean Schupke
| Sent: 03 November 2004 10:08
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: GHC
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 14:45, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 09 November 2004 12:54, Duncan Coutts wrote:
[snip]
When I do time profiling, the big cost centres come up as putByte and
putWord. When I profile for space it shows the large FiniteMaps
dominating most everything else. I originally
