Hrm, is the GHC magic memo function still around? In 5.0.4 it was
in util, but I can't seem to find it in 6.2.2.
- a
--
I wrote my own mail server and it still has a few bugs.
If you send me a message and it bounces, please forward the
bounce message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks!
On 04 December 2004 01:49, Ben Kavanagh wrote:
I'm going to create a standard dist for cygwin.
In order to do so, according to the porting guide I need to build a
set of .hc files with mingw32(same hardware) and then use hc-build
with those. To create the hc files from mingw32 for use with
On 04 December 2004 04:27, Judah Jacobson wrote:
What exactly are redex's, in this context,
Any expression which can be beta-reduced or case-reduced.
and is it (still?) true that GHC never expands them?
I'm not sure if GHC guarantees never to duplicate a redex, Simon PJ
might know.
Or are
On 06 December 2004 06:03, Adam Megacz wrote:
Hrm, is the GHC magic memo function still around? In 5.0.4 it was
in util, but I can't seem to find it in 6.2.2.
It's still there in module Memo, in the util package. It's scheduled
for demolition in 6.6.
Cheers,
Simon
| and is it (still?) true that GHC never expands them?
|
| I'm not sure if GHC guarantees never to duplicate a redex, Simon PJ
| might know.
Yes, it's very careful not to duplicate a redex, except for ones of
known bounded size, like x +# y, where sharing the work costs more than
duplicating
On 06 December 2004 13:25, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
and is it (still?) true that GHC never expands them?
I'm not sure if GHC guarantees never to duplicate a redex, Simon PJ
might know.
Yes, it's very careful not to duplicate a redex, except for ones of
known bounded size, like x +# y,
Simon Marlow wrote:
[...] I doubt it'll be trivial - probably lots of
#ifdef mingw32_TARGET_OS
will need to change to
#if defined(mingw32_TARGET_OS) || defined(cygwin_TARGET_OS)
[...]
Hmmm, having some fragile OS-dependent #ifdefs is not the way to go.
While you are there, every
#ifdef
