On 05 January 2005 22:20, Wolfgang Thaller wrote:
The hook idea works with static linking: the RTS provides a default
version of the hook, that can be overriden by a user-supplied
function of the same name. This is what GHC does. However, our
dynamic linker doesn't support this kind of
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:29:58AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
Greetings GHC users!
As you may be aware, we're heading for a 6.4 release in the near future,
with plenty of shiny new features. The aim is to get it out in a month
or so, including a couple of weeks of release candidate testing.
| I was curious whether type assosiated classes will make it into 6.4? I
| think it would be a very useful thing.
|
|
http://research.microsoft.com/Users/simonpj/papers/assoc-types/index.htm
Definitely not, I'm afraid. Implementation isn't started. It's far
from straightforward, which is why
Actually, I had submitted the feature request before joining the list. I did
follow Sven's instructions, with similer errors, and sent the requested files to
the list before the holidays, did anyone get them? I haven't seend them come
through myself...
On Tue Jan 4 10:08 , 'Simon Marlow'