On 02 February 2005 12:22, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:02:45AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
>> So the new approach is to try to build up a global table of the
>> "best" destinations to link to for each entity.
>
> Having a canonical home location for each entity might also hel
Hi,
I've installed ghc-6.3.20050202-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 only to find
out that gcc-3.4.1 seems to be hard-wired into this ghc:
ghc-6.3.20050202: could not execute: gcc-3.4.1
Why is this so. Do I need to install from sources? My current gcc
version is:
gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)
Cheers C
On 04 February 2005 12:23, Christian Maeder wrote:
> I've installed ghc-6.3.20050202-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 only to
> find out that gcc-3.4.1 seems to be hard-wired into this ghc:
>
> ghc-6.3.20050202: could not execute: gcc-3.4.1
>
> Why is this so. Do I need to install from sources? My cur
Simon Marlow wrote:
can compile from source to get around this. The STABLE snapshots don't
have this problem.
In
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/
there are only ghc-6.2.x snapshots, right?
What version is today's entry?
ghc--i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 04-Feb-2005 07:10 2
Simon Marlow wrote:
On 04 February 2005 12:23, Christian Maeder wrote:
ghc-6.3.20050202: could not execute: gcc-3.4.1
This is because we currently configure the nightly builds to use
gcc-3.4.1, and unfortunately that gets baked into the GHC binary. You
can compile from source to get around this.
Hi,
I've installed ghc-6.3.20050202-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 only to find
out that gcc-3.4.1 seems to be hard-wired into this ghc:
ghc-6.3.20050202: could not execute: gcc-3.4.1
Why is this so. Do I need to install from sources? My current gcc
version is:
gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)
Cheers
