On 09 February 2005 20:03, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:11:34PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hi folks,
For the forthcoming 6.4 release, we'd like to get a rough idea of
download statistics, at least from haskell.org. Both Simon I are
too busy/lazy (delete as
Good morning,
gcc uses a different convention from the Microsoft environment when it
comes to laying out fields in C structs, in particular bit fields. Can I
pass the -optc--mms-bitfields to ghc when it compiles via C without
negative effect?
This flag is not implicit at the moment which I
We are finally at the release candidate stage for GHC 6.4. Snapshots
with versions 6.4.20050209 and later should be considered release
candidates for 6.4.
Source and Linux binary distributions are avaiable here:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/
Please test if you're able to, and
On 09 February 2005 08:53, Axel Simon wrote:
gcc uses a different convention from the Microsoft environment when it
comes to laying out fields in C structs, in particular bit fields.
Can I pass the -optc--mms-bitfields to ghc when it compiles via C
without negative effect?
This flag is not
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are finally at the release candidate stage for GHC 6.4. Snapshots
with versions 6.4.20050209 and later should be considered release
candidates for 6.4.
Using: ghc-6.4.20050209-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2
$ cat hello.hs
main = putStrLn hello
On 10 February 2005 13:31, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are finally at the release candidate stage for GHC 6.4. Snapshots
with versions 6.4.20050209 and later should be considered release
candidates for 6.4.
Using:
On 10 February 2005 13:40, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 10 February 2005 13:31, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are finally at the release candidate stage for GHC 6.4.
Snapshots with versions 6.4.20050209 and later should be considered
release candidates for
On 09 February 2005 13:32, Peter Simons wrote:
I have an interesting problem. There are two versions of the
HsDNS package installed right now:
$ ghc-pkg list
| /usr/local/ghc-current/lib/ghc-6.5/package.conf:
| rts-1.0, [...] (hsdns-2005-02-04),
| hsdns-2005-02-08
Now how
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are finally at the release candidate stage for GHC 6.4.
Please test if you're able to, and give us feedback.
In versions 5.00 = ghc = 6.2.2, the result of
ghc -v 21 | head -2
was something like
Glasgow Haskell Compiler, Version 6.2.2,
On 10 February 2005 15:13, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are finally at the release candidate stage for GHC 6.4.
Please test if you're able to, and give us feedback.
In versions 5.00 = ghc = 6.2.2, the result of
ghc -v 21 | head -2
was
On 10 February 2005 15:36, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, fixed. The right way to get the location of the package.conf
file is to ask ghc-pkg, BTW. In fact, the right way is not to know
the location of package.conf at all, but to use ghc-pkg to query its
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and how do you find out what $libdir refers to...?
ghc --print-libdir
Cool. Will fix hmake to use it.
Regards,
Malcolm
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:13:36PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.2.2-2
/usr/lib/libpthread.so (comes from libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-20) is a GNU
linker script, not a shared object. This breaks ghci.
Known problem:
$ ghc-pkg-6.4.20050209 --show-package=base --field=import_dirs
[/usr/malcolm/local/lib/ghc-6.4.20050209/imports]
yet
$ ghc-pkg-6.4.20050209 --show-package=base-1.0 --field=import_dirs
ghc-pkg: cannot find package base-1.0
$ ghc-pkg-6.4.20050209 --list-packages
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 13:11 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Please test if you're able to, and give us feedback.
I've noticed that running main of the attached code, using Proxy
data-types to simulate context parameters (see previous email) still
sends something into an infinite loop; is this my
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:58 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:13:36PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.2.2-2
/usr/lib/libpthread.so (comes from libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-20) is a GNU
linker script, not a shared object. This breaks ghci.
Known
Simon Marlow writes:
The general syntax of package ids is:
pkgid ::= pkg ('-' version)?
pkg ::= (alphanum|'-')+
version ::= (digit+) ('.' digit+)* ('-' alphanum+)*
Thanks. I gave my package the version hsdns-0.0-2005-02-10
and that fixed the problem.
Perhaps we should
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 07:00:47PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Hi Ian,
What is your particular problem?
Running Darcs under ghci.
This seems to work for me (at least in as much as ghci loads and
FastPackedString.lengthPS (FastPackedString.packString Foo)
says 3):
rm -rf .libs
rm
When -fglasgow-exts is on, (#) no longer seems to be recognized. (I get
a parse error.) however # works fine as an infix operator.
John
--
John Meacham - repetae.netjohn
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
