Jens Petersen wrote:
Brian Strand wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some serious issues getting GHC to run on Suse 9.2/x86
(or x86-64
for that matter, although I didn't really expect that to work without
some pain
and suffering). I've had no luck with 6.2.2, or any 6.4 release
candidate. Here is a
Brian Strand wrote:
Jens Petersen wrote:
Brian Strand wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some serious issues getting GHC to run on Suse 9.2/x86
(or x86-64
for that matter, although I didn't really expect that to work
without some pain
and suffering). I've had no luck with 6.2.2, or any 6.4 release
Anders Höckersten wrote:
...
There are some debian packages of ghc 6.2.2 and related stuff for amd64
located here:
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/pool/unstable/main/amd64/g/ghc6/
Hopefully you can find some way to convert these to a format you can
install (there are programs for
On 22 February 2005 14:35, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
However, it could be worthwhile halting with an error message.
case `pwd` in
*' '*)
echo Error: nhc98 will not build in a directory with spaces
anywhere echoin the full pathname.
echo Suggestion:
On 22 February 2005 19:37, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Excellent! Thanks a lot.
Any hint as to when the next Haddock release will be?
Maybe when I've got this GHC release out of the way and my hair has
grown back :-S
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
On 23 February 2005 11:01, Brian Strand wrote:
Thanks a lot! For anyone who runs into the same problem, here is
what I did:
1. Converted to an rpm via alien -r ghc6_6.2.2-3_amd64.deb
2. Installed the resulting rpm.
3. When I tried to run ghc6, I got
/usr/lib/ghc-6.2.2 # /usr/bin/ghc6
On 22 February 2005 20:05, Brian Strand wrote:
I'm having some serious issues getting GHC to run on Suse 9.2/x86
(or x86-64 for that matter, although I didn't really expect that to
work without some pain and suffering). I've had no luck with 6.2.2,
or any 6.4 release candidate. Here is a
Simon Marlow wrote:
On 22 February 2005 20:05, Brian Strand wrote:
[ snipped ]
You actually need the .hc source files too, which don't come with the
source distribution because they have to be built for each target
platform.
That section of the Building Guide wasn't really clear enough on this
Thanks, good to know; I'll read through 10.2 more carefully. I didn't
think I'd need to cross-compile x86-linux to x86-linux.
You don't need to - the recommended way is to download a binary
version. If you don't like using binary distributions, then use it for
bootstrapping only, i.e. use it
Hi
I got ghc-6.5 prerelease from the CVS and managed to get it up and
running, *except* for ghci, the interactive part.
Is there something in particular that I need to think about to make
ghci support get compiled into ghc?
Johan Glimming.
___
Hi
I got ghc-6.5 prerelease from the CVS and managed to get it up and
running, *except* for ghci, the interactive part.
It worked last time I tried.
Is there something in particular that I need to think about to make
ghci support get compiled into ghc?
When using ghc-inplace, make sure you're
Wolfgang Thaller wrote:
Thanks, good to know; I'll read through 10.2 more carefully. I didn't
think I'd need to cross-compile x86-linux to x86-linux.
You don't need to - the recommended way is to download a binary version.
If you don't like using binary distributions, then use it for
Brian Strand wrote:
I originally tried the binary distribution but ran into library
issues. That is of course the obvious path to try, and try it I did.
Rather than going straight to installing deprecated libraries, I tried
to provide some feedback on ghc (especially since 6.4 RCs are out).
Brian Strand wrote:
Unfortunately I'm still stuck on x86-64, since there are no official
binaries to bootstrap from on that platform. But at least I have a ghc
to play with while waiting for x86-64 to become official.
There is a x86_64 build already in Fedora Haskell.
Perhaps you can try it?
14 matches
Mail list logo
