On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:56:25PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 22 March 2005 10:10, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
>
> > Well, looking at the makefile it becomes clear, that it must do so.
> > -
> > # Make DerivedConstants.h for the compiler
> >
> > all :: Deriv
Sorry. Forgot to ask the next question on this process. Now that I have
unregistered compiler, how do I build the registered one?
I've tried to start with new tree and then run
./configure --with-ghc=T/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
make
But this resulted in an error
==fptools== make boot - --no-print
On 23 March 2005 09:18, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
> Sorry. Forgot to ask the next question on this process. Now that I
> have unregistered compiler, how do I build the registered one?
>
> I've tried to start with new tree and then run
>
> ./configure --with-ghc=T/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
> make
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:26:26AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 23 March 2005 09:18, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
>
> > Sorry. Forgot to ask the next question on this process. Now that I
> > have unregistered compiler, how do I build the registered one?
> >
> > I've tried to start with new tree an
On 22 March 2005 17:49, Matthias Neubauer wrote:
> ... we also need the state after renaming, but we then have to stop, I
> suppose!
Yes, the HaRE folks also want the renamed abstract syntax too. We
haven't quite figured out how best to make it available: renaming is
intertwined with typecheckin
