John Goerzen wrote:
On 2005-06-06, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lots of people seem to have had problems compiling Wash with GHC 6.4.
Another person told me, perhaps in private, that it just takes GHC 15
minutes to compile the specific file in question on amd64. It t
On 2005-06-06, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lots of people seem to have had problems compiling Wash with GHC 6.4.
Another person told me, perhaps in private, that it just takes GHC 15
minutes to compile the specific file in question on amd64. It turns out
that there is not a ha
Hello,
I have made an, as far as I can tell, working copy of WASH for GHC 6.4.
You can get it with:
darcs get http://darcs.complete.org/local-branches/WashNGo
Here are the basic things I did:
* Applied the GHC 6.4 compatibility patch I found on one of these lists
* Converted the build system
Dear GHC developers and users,
Could you, please, help with ghc-pkg ?
(in ghc-6.4)
The contrived testing project is of the two small modules
M1.hs, M2.hs.
(find enclosed the source).
`Makefile' is set so that make dm
should compile the modules and put *.hi, *.o modules and .a, .o
li
Hi Serge,
On 05 June 2005 11:58, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> for the first time compiles all the modules before Foo in
> 50 seconds.
> Then, I fix an error in Foo.hs and repeat "make dm".
>
> The options are set so that ghc-6.2.2 gets to Foo.hs in less
> than 1 second when doing thi
On 06 June 2005 12:44, Ketil Malde wrote:
> Recently, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk posted a micro-benchmark on
> comp.lang.functional, illustrating performance with statically typed
> Int and Integer, and Kogut's dynamically typed automatically-promoted
> numbers. (Int is fastest, Kogut second, and
Hi,
Recently, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk posted a micro-benchmark on
comp.lang.functional, illustrating performance with statically typed
Int and Integer, and Kogut's dynamically typed automatically-promoted
numbers. (Int is fastest, Kogut second, and Integer quite a bit
slower).
For fun, I tri
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 15:18 +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> Dear GHC developers,
>
> Please, how to re-export (qualified) Data.Set, Data.Map ?
[snip]
> For ghc-6.4, I need qualified import of Data.Set, Data.Map
> and need to re-export it. I am trying
[snip]
> I wonder, how the needed
Lots of people seem to have had problems compiling Wash with GHC 6.4.
As far as we know, they are all caused by the fact that the
package-configuration file format changed in 6.4, and you need to fix
that before it'll compile cleanly. Maybe someone can make available a
version of Wash that works,
Dear GHC developers,
Please, how to re-export (qualified) Data.Set, Data.Map ?
In ghc-6.2.2, I used only
---
{-# OPTIONS -fno-warn-duplicate-exports #-}
module Reexport (module Data.Set, ...)
...
import Data.Set
---
module
On 06 June 2005 09:04, Gary Morris wrote:
> --- begin: AccuTime.hs
>
> module AccuTime where
>
> import Foreign.C.Types
>
> foreign import stdcall unsafe "accutime.h accuticks" c_accuticks ::
> IO CULLong
>
> accuticks :: IO Integer
> accuticks = do ull <- c_accuticks
>return
Hello everyone,
Apologies in advance if I'm asking an incredibly simple question, but
I'm using GHC 6.4 on Windows XP SP2. I was recently playing with
implementing the Kocher attack on RSA in Haskell, and along the way I
needed a reasonable way to time operations -- the built-in Windows
function
12 matches
Mail list logo
