Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread John Meacham
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:56:14AM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > john: > > can't we just make 'darcs send' send the patches to a public list so > > people can see them that way as they are sent in. > > I think the problem would be that we still want multiple developers to > darcs push over

Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
john: > can't we just make 'darcs send' send the patches to a public list so > people can see them that way as they are sent in. I think the problem would be that we still want multiple developers to darcs push over ssh, don't we? Rather than darcs sending patches to a list, for a mainatiner to pi

Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
Malcolm.Wallace: > "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The aim is to eventually switch over to using darcs for our revision > > control. The point of this message is to find out what constraints > > people have that will affect when we can throw the switch. > > One thing it occurs t

Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread John Meacham
can't we just make 'darcs send' send the patches to a public list so people can see them that way as they are sent in. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.

darcs commit emails was Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread Shae Matijs Erisson
Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One thing it occurs to me to ask is what will be happening to CVS commit > messages, once the switchover to darcs happens? rss2email is one solution. It's a python script that runs from cron, so you won't have to worry about fiddling with darcs postho

Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread Malcolm Wallace
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The aim is to eventually switch over to using darcs for our revision > control. The point of this message is to find out what constraints > people have that will affect when we can throw the switch. One thing it occurs to me to ask is what will be hap

Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread Ross Paterson
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:50:02PM +, John Goerzen wrote: > On 2005-12-19, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> But how about having a separate repository for each library package? > > > > Seconded. > > Simon, any thoughts? Also, if the

Re: darcs switchover

2005-12-20 Thread John Goerzen
On 2005-12-19, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> No problem for me if you switch over at any time. But how about having >> a separate repository for each library package? > > Seconded. Simon, any thoughts? We could go about this one of