On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:56:14AM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> john:
> > can't we just make 'darcs send' send the patches to a public list so
> > people can see them that way as they are sent in.
>
> I think the problem would be that we still want multiple developers to
> darcs push over
john:
> can't we just make 'darcs send' send the patches to a public list so
> people can see them that way as they are sent in.
I think the problem would be that we still want multiple developers to
darcs push over ssh, don't we? Rather than darcs sending patches to a
list, for a mainatiner to pi
Malcolm.Wallace:
> "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The aim is to eventually switch over to using darcs for our revision
> > control. The point of this message is to find out what constraints
> > people have that will affect when we can throw the switch.
>
> One thing it occurs t
can't we just make 'darcs send' send the patches to a public list so
people can see them that way as they are sent in.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.
Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One thing it occurs to me to ask is what will be happening to CVS commit
> messages, once the switchover to darcs happens?
rss2email is one solution. It's a python script that runs from cron, so you
won't have to worry about fiddling with darcs postho
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The aim is to eventually switch over to using darcs for our revision
> control. The point of this message is to find out what constraints
> people have that will affect when we can throw the switch.
One thing it occurs to me to ask is what will be hap
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:50:02PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> On 2005-12-19, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> But how about having a separate repository for each library package?
> >
> > Seconded.
>
> Simon, any thoughts?
Also, if the
On 2005-12-19, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> No problem for me if you switch over at any time. But how about having
>> a separate repository for each library package?
>
> Seconded.
Simon, any thoughts?
We could go about this one of