Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Thorkil,
Wednesday, March 29, 2006, 2:15:05 AM, you wrote:
Thorkil, i can't understand why you can't just use FFI to import
functions you required? why you need to patch the PrimOps list?
As I wrote earlier, using FFI is also a candidate for getting access to
On Thursday 30 March 2006 14:13, Brian Hulley wrote:
John Meacham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:50:06AM +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
where the intention is that the callback will take the width and
height of the window and return a RenderM action, the problem is
that because the FFI
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
[snip]
Thus, GHC does nothing wrong, according to the addendum. That doesn't
mean allowing IO-equivalent newtypes wouldn't be a good idea. It is
just not written in the addendum.
Apologies for not reading the addendum properly and slighting the good
character of
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 01:35, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
primitives work with just the same internal structures. i thinl that
only real advantage of adding primop instead of adding FFI import is
that PrimOps.cmm contains already implemented wrappers for calling GMP
functions while for FFI you
Simon Marlow wrote:
Michael Marte wrote:
Now I get the following error:
GHC/PrimopWrappers.hs:565:20: Not in scope: `GHC.Prim.forkOn#'
I think this problem may be releated to the other changes I pulled.
You probably need to rebuild some stuff. If your stage 1 compiler is
up to date,
