Were always on the lookout for
some Cygwin-savvy person to do this. There should be nothing difficult in
principle, but probably quite a lot of delicate details like fixing backslash
directions.
Simon
Also, any ideas how difficult a Cygwin port of GHC
would be? Tips would be
I was just musing the other day about the possibility of allowing
(efficient and transparent) destructive updates in certain situations.
Take the following (giberish) example:
f xs = g xs []
where g [] ac = ac
g (x1:x2:xs) ac = g xs (ac ++ [x2,x1])
It seems to me that the list
I am interested in better understanding what optimizations of this
sort GHC performs. I second Lajos's question.
I sometimes write code using StateMonad, and expect some destructive
updates. Judging by the performance of the resulting executable, the
updates are nondestructive. (But,
On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Lajos Nagy wrote:
I was just musing the other day about the possibility of allowing
(efficient and transparent) destructive updates in certain
situations. Take the following (giberish) example:
f xs = g xs []
where g [] ac = ac
g (x1:x2:xs) ac = g
