Hi,
> The compile / fix compiler errors cycle is an important part
> of the development process for me, and so I want
> recompilation to go as quickly as possible.
If you are not using any GHC specific features, then I find that using
Hugs for compiler errors, then once Hugs is happy moving on to
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:57:32PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> I have two examples of projects that use Makefiles, darcs and jhc, but
> they both appear to hand-code the list of dependencies for
> executables. The "-M" option to ghc should let us do this
> automatically, but either because of a
Hi all,
I have a project which currently uses Cabal, and I would like to
switch to using a plain Makefile.
I have two examples of projects that use Makefiles, darcs and jhc, but
they both appear to hand-code the list of dependencies for
executables. The "-M" option to ghc should let us do this
a
I've tried building ghc with
make all; make install
But when compiling one of my programs I get
GHC stage restriction: `view'
is used in a top-level splice, and must be imported, not
defined locally
What did I do wrong?
Marc
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
