Hello Lemmih,
Thursday, May 4, 2006, 6:32:17 AM, you wrote:
> Nothing, my patches for loading 'ghc' in ghci have resided in the main
> repository for a couple of months.
afaik, Lemmih just uses HEAD (6.5), i.e. beta version of ghc, which is
only version that includes this lib
--
Best regards
Hello,
I believe I have successfully got an unregisterised version of ghc
6.4.2 compiled for arm/linux.
Details:
---
I only had to do a minor bit of hacking -- this bug contains the
details of what went wrong:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/762
My target platform is the nokia 7
On 5/4/06, wld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 5/4/06, Lemmih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can also use the GHC library:
> Prelude> :m GHC
> Prelude GHC> GHC.init (Just "/home/david/coding/haskell/ghc/usr/lib/ghc-6.5")
> Prelude GHC> session <- newSession Interactive
> Prelude GHC> setSe
Hi,
On 5/4/06, Lemmih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can also use the GHC library:
Prelude> :m GHC
Prelude GHC> GHC.init (Just "/home/david/coding/haskell/ghc/usr/lib/ghc-6.5")
Prelude GHC> session <- newSession Interactive
Prelude GHC> setSessionDynFlags session =<< initPackages =<<
getSession
lemmih:
> On 5/4/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >geoffw:
> >>
> >> I have an application written in OCaml that I'm interested in
> >> porting over to Haskell, and I was wondering what the best way to
> >replace
> >> the following OCaml function would be:
> >>
> >
On 5/4/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
geoffw:
>
> I have an application written in OCaml that I'm interested in
> porting over to Haskell, and I was wondering what the best way to
replace
> the following OCaml function would be:
>
> Toploop.initialize_toplevel_en
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:29:16AM +, Aaron Denney wrote:
> On 2006-04-29, Manuel M T Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 16:37 -0700 schrieb John Meacham:
> >> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:28:01PM -0700, John Meacham wrote:
> >> > I was curious if ghc could
geoffw:
>
> I have an application written in OCaml that I'm interested in
> porting over to Haskell, and I was wondering what the best way to
> replace
> the following OCaml function would be:
>
> Toploop.initialize_toplevel_env();;
>
> let eval txt = let lb = (Lexing.from_string
I have an application written in OCaml that I'm interested in porting
over to Haskell, and I was wondering what the best way to replace the
following OCaml function would be:
Toploop.initialize_toplevel_env();;
let eval txt = let lb = (Lexing.from_string txt) in
let phr = !Toploop.parse_to
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:56:18PM +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:50:46AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hi,
[..]
> > Try running GHC with -v, see whether the -fomit-frame-pointer flag is
> > being passed to gcc. If not, try to find out why - it should be added
> > by co
On 03 May 2006 13:27, Michael Marte wrote:
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>
>> Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:53:19AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>>>
I'm afraid I don't understand: there's no Pretty module in the
standard libraries, only Text.PrettyPrint.
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:50:46AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hi,
> You shouldn't see the %ebp instructions, because gcc should be invoked
> with -fomit-frame-pointer. Is it possible that somehow part of your
> build thinks it is unregisterised?
I hope not. Started with a fresh tree and confi
Simon Marlow wrote:
Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:53:19AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand: there's no Pretty module in the
standard libraries, only Text.PrettyPrint.
There is a Pretty module in the text package. It seems that Michael uses
"ghc
Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:53:19AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand: there's no Pretty module in the standard
libraries, only Text.PrettyPrint.
There is a Pretty module in the text package. It seems that Michael uses
"ghc -package text".
Ok (t
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:53:19AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't understand: there's no Pretty module in the standard
> libraries, only Text.PrettyPrint.
There is a Pretty module in the text package. It seems that Michael uses
"ghc -package text".
Best regards
Tomasz
__
wld wrote:
As described in trac ticket 738, GHC HEAD does not
work on Fedora Core 5 with selinux in enforcing
mode. Selinux is the additional level of protection
in Linux kernel that works above usual Unix
permissions. Turning selinux to permissive mode
(as suggested in the workaround to make GHC
I'm afraid I don't understand: there's no Pretty module in the standard
libraries, only Text.PrettyPrint.
Could you describe in more detail what's going wrong? (provide example
code and exact command lines, cut & paste error messages).
Cheers,
Simon
Michael Marte wrote:
Simon,
I c
Georg Sauthoff wrote:
Ok, I tried[1] that and like I guessed, now I get again the infamous
'Prologue junk?' error' again:
../../ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace -H16m -O -O2 -static -I. -#include Prelude.h
-#include Rts.h -#include RtsFlags.h -#include RtsUtils.h -#include StgRun.h
-#include Schedul
At the moment GHC just doesn't support this, I'm afraid. It's a
shortcoming, and one that could be fixed, but not in a minute or two.
You'll have to find some other way to reorganise your code, I think.
Incidentally questions specific to GHC belong on ghc-users, to which I
have redirected this me
19 matches
Mail list logo