On Oct 16, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Rodney D Price wrote:
bunzip2 ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
tar -xvf ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar
These can be combined in one step:
tar -xfvj ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
Deborah
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mai
> Yeah. That'd have a different quick fix:
>
> cp /usr/lib/ghc-6.6/libHSCabal.a /usr/lib/Cabal-1.1.6/ghc-6.6/
>
> because ghci uses the .o files and ghc uses the .a ones.
Thanks it works! Now I can finally start playing with the GHC API.
Bas
___
Glasgow
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Simon Marlow wrote:
There's one restriction that I know of: you should be careful not to cast a
function value to a non-function type (except a polymorphic type), because
the two have incompatible representations when it comes to seq and case.
And of course, you should nev
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 17:42 +0200, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 12:41, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > This is a problem with the way we have packaged it for Gentoo. We know
> > the source of the problem and will fix it soon.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> On Monday 16 October 2006 12:46, Cle
I don't know about Hugs, but you can add an explicit 'forall' to the
type sig for allocUnboxed, to bring the type variables into scope.
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/type-extensions.
html#scoped-type-variables
S
| -Original Message-
| From: Bulat Ziganshin [mailt
Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
should the following work in 6.6?
-- | Alloc the mutable byte vector having `elems` elements of required type
allocUnboxed :: (STorIO m s, Integral elems, Unboxed a)
=> elems -> m (MUVec s a)
allocUnboxed elems :: m (MUVec s a) = -- it's line 149
Here's what worked for me:
bunzip2 ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
tar -xvf ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar
cd ghc-6.6
./configure
sudo make show-install-setup
sudo make install
ghc --version
The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.6
I'm on a MacBook Pro running OS X 10.4.8.
Hello everyone,
I would like to hack on GHC interactively. My aim is to load ghc into
ghci and start hacking a source file in one emacs buffer, while the
other hosts an inferior-haskell session connected to GHCi. I really
like this kind of development style and found it to be way more
productive t
On Monday 16 October 2006 12:41, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> This is a problem with the way we have packaged it for Gentoo. We know
> the source of the problem and will fix it soon.
Great, thanks.
On Monday 16 October 2006 12:46, Clemens Fruhwirth wrote:
> The problem is Gentoo specific. Quick dirty f
Wolfgang Thaller wrote:
Could someone on MacOS X try the 6.4.x branch again? I just
committed a fix that makes the threaded RTS more stable on Solaris,
and I'm hoping it clears up the problems on MacOS X too. Remember to
re-enable -threaded in ghc/compiler/Makefile if you previously
disa
Could someone on MacOS X try the 6.4.x branch again? I just
committed a fix that makes the threaded RTS more stable on Solaris,
and I'm hoping it clears up the problems on MacOS X too. Remember
to re-enable -threaded in ghc/compiler/Makefile if you previously
disabled it.
The problem se
Sounds great, thanks!
-Chad
On 10/16/06, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GHC 6.6 does run code in parallel on SMP hardware, but the GC is still single
threaded. We have a prototype parallel GC, and I'm planning to work on it some
more in the next few months... you'll probably see it i
Could someone on MacOS X try the 6.4.x branch again? I just committed a fix
that makes the threaded RTS more stable on Solaris, and I'm hoping it clears up
the problems on MacOS X too. Remember to re-enable -threaded in
ghc/compiler/Makefile if you previously disabled it.
If this does indeed
Hi,
After downloading Haskell 98 (current version), I tried to load stdm by typing :load stdm I kept gettin could not find module 'stdm'
I added path under system variables under environment variables like this: control panel/system/Aadvanced/(under system variable)Environment variables/path
Christian Maeder wrote:
I would like to get ghc (version 6.6) working for our students. The
machines are ATHLON-64 with Solaris 10. (SunOS 5.10 Generic_118855-19
i86pc i386 i86pc)
If someone has a binary distribution of any ghc version (that is able to
build ghc-6.6), please let me know.
>
B
Björn Buckwalter wrote:
I downloaded the GHC 6.6 tarballs, built and installed them on my mac
(Tiger, PPC) using the documented procedure:
./configure
make
make install
The build and install was fairly smooth. However, ghci will not
recognize "control characters", e.g. delete/backspace, arro
FWIW, Lennart Augustsson's Cayenne compiler can compile to GHC
nowadays. It uses exactly this method of sprinkling coerce all over
the place to make GHC's typechecker happy.
http://www.augustsson.net/Darcs/Cayenne/
Cheers,
Josef
On 10/16/06, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neil Mitche
Chad Scherrer wrote:
IIRC, there was some work being done this past summer on parallelizing
GC for SMP GHC (I think that's my current record for most acronyms in
one sentence). GHC 6.6 is reported as having single-threaded GC, and
I'm wondering if an unforeseen technical problem might have come u
Neil Mitchell wrote:
I would like to write a translator which takes a Haskell-like language
to GHC compilable Haskell. This Haskell-like language is not
explicitly typed, and cannot have types inferred for it (rank 2 types
may exist etc), however it is known that the program will not crash
with
At Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:29:22 +0200,
Bas van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (I noticed my reply to Mathew Mills didn't reach the GHC list, so here it is.)
>
> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 21:53, Mathew Mills wrote:
> > Interesting. I was unable to reproduce your problem. What platform
> >
Hi
I do not see foldl' in the standard library.
Is it of the GHC lib extension? has it strictness annotation?
Hoogle it!
http://haskell.org/hoogle/?q=foldl%27
Data.List.foldl' :: (a -> b -> a) -> a -> [b] -> a
Thanks
Neil
___
Glasgow-haskell-u
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:23 +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> Concerning the laziness support problem,
>
> I thank people for explanations about foldl and foldr.
>
> >> I wonder how to avoid these numerous cost pitfalls.
> >> Maybe, the complier could do more optimization?
>
>
> Duncan Cout
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 12:29 +0200, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> (I noticed my reply to Mathew Mills didn't reach the GHC list, so here it is.)
>
> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 21:53, Mathew Mills wrote:
> > Interesting. I was unable to reproduce your problem. What platform
> > are you running on? Are
(I noticed my reply to Mathew Mills didn't reach the GHC list, so here it is.)
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 21:53, Mathew Mills wrote:
> Interesting. I was unable to reproduce your problem. What platform
> are you running on? Are you using a binary distribution or one you
> built from source?
Concerning the laziness support problem,
I thank people for explanations about foldl and foldr.
>> I wonder how to avoid these numerous cost pitfalls.
>> Maybe, the complier could do more optimization?
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> There are important differences between foldl,
| How does GHC react to a really large number of unsafeCoerce's? Is this
| likely to destroy performance? Has anything like this been done
| before? I know that LML was able to "turn off" the type checker, but I
| guess GHC doesn't have such an option, because of its typed Core
| language.
I've ne
26 matches
Mail list logo
