ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6 for PC-Solaris

2006-11-01 Thread Christian Maeder
Herewith I announce a binary distribution for PCs under Solaris 10. http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/agbkb/forschung/formal_methods/CoFI/hets/pc-solaris/versions/ghc-6.6-i386-unknown-solaris2.tar.bz2 It's only a prototypical distribution that has been created without a threaded rts and without

RE: instance Data (Complex a)

2006-11-01 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
I've added 'deriving Data' to Complex. (There are probably other missing ones too...let us know.) S | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | On Behalf Of Chad Scherrer | Sent: 26 October 2006 19:08 | To: GHC Users | Subject: instance Data (Complex a) |

RE: Proposal for stand-alone deriving declarations?

2006-11-01 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
The thread about "stand-alone" deriving is long-ish now, so I have summarised the issues here: http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC/StandAloneDeriving Perhaps those who are interested can add their thoughts? Bjorn is busy at the moment, but I think he'll get back to the implementation in

Re[4]: [Hugs-users] Record puns, time for removal?

2006-11-01 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Iavor, Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 10:06:01 PM, you wrote: > By the way, if I recall correctly, in Johan Nordlander's O'Hugs the .. > notation (called record packing, I think) could also be used to create > record values. I think it worked like this: >> data Point = Point { x,y :: Int } >>