Re: Become a GHC build slave!

I believe that there is value in having multiple BuildBots for the same platform. More value is provided when differences are maximized between BuildBots but there is value in having similar BuildBots (particularly, if the similar BuildBots are popular). Even in the relatively monoculture

Re: Become a GHC build slave!

Wilson MacGyver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there is no reason for multiple build-bot for the same platform is there? If you have two or three slaves for each platform, then the buildbot is robustified against downtime of any of the machines (intentional, like going on holiday for a couple of

Re: Become a GHC build slave!

Hi, One of the issues the Yhc people had with Mac buildbots is that no one figured out how to get the buildbot slaves to run on startup with a Mac. If one of the Mac people does figure that out, adding it to the wiki would be most appreciated. Thanks Neil On 2/5/07, Malcolm Wallace [EMAIL

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Become a GHC build slave!

Neil Mitchell wrote: Hi Simon, Thanks largely to Ian Lynagh, GHC now has a BuildBot infrastructure to automate nightly builds on multiple platforms. This replaces the old set of shell scripts that we used to run nightly builds; now adding new clients to the setup is relatively easy,

(no subject)

Hello everyone, I did at my master thesis a compiler that generates Haskell code. Now I need to measure the execution time of my generated code and I've been searched and I don't know if I'm looking with the wrong keywords but I could not find anything. I just need to measure the time of

Re: time profiling (was: (no subject))

On 2/5/07, Tays Soares [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, I did at my master thesis a compiler that generates Haskell code. Now I need to measure the execution time of my generated code and I've been searched and I don't know if I'm looking with the wrong keywords but I could not

No instance for (Monad ((-) Integer))

I'm getting this error in ghci, and I think it should typecheck just fine. Prelude let fs = [(+2), (*4)] Prelude :t fs fs :: [Integer - Integer] Prelude :t sequence fs interactive:1:0: No instance for (Monad ((-) Integer)) arising from use of `sequence' at interactive:1:0-10 Possible

Re: (no subject)

Hi Tays, I did at my master thesis a compiler that generates Haskell code. Now I need to measure the execution time of my generated code and I've been searched and I don't know if I'm looking with the wrong keywords but I could not find anything. I just need to measure the time of simple

Re: No instance for (Monad ((-) Integer))

Hi Chad, Prelude let fs = [(+2), (*4)] Prelude :t fs fs :: [Integer - Integer] Prelude :t sequence fs I think you need to import Control.Monad.Instances to get the appropriate instance in scope. Thanks Neil ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list

Re: No instance for (Monad ((-) Integer))

On 2/5/07, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chad, Prelude let fs = [(+2), (*4)] Prelude :t fs fs :: [Integer - Integer] Prelude :t sequence fs I think you need to import Control.Monad.Instances to get the appropriate instance in scope. Hmm, that's weird. The instance Monad ((-)

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Become a GHC build slave!

I'm joining this discussion a bit late, but ... I can provide a build machines for netbsd and freebsd. I didn't see those on the URL cited below. They are fairly common, so perhaps I just missed them. In any event, if netbsd and/or freebsd will be helpful, please let me know. Seth Kurtzberg