Hello,
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 16:41, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce the Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.6.1.
> ...
A few comments to the source bundles
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.6.20070410-src.tar.bz2
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 12:23:35 PM, you wrote:
> After I upgrade to 6.6.1 (using OS X on PPC) then I will make new versions of
> regex-compat and regex-tdfa. The thing I have to fix is that the current
> "unstable" regex-tdfa depends on the "unstable" regex-base and I have to ma
Just a further note on the FreeBSD/amd64 port. I have the
mangler fixed up now, so the only remaining issue is the linker.
I hope to send patches soon.
Best Wishes,
Greg
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Marlow wrote:
> I definitely think that -1# should be parsed as a single lexeme.
> Presumably it was easier at the time to do it the way it is, I don't
> remember exactly.
>
> I'd support a warning for use of prefix negation, or alternatively y
Simon Marlow wrote:
> Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
>> Could the solution be to depend on a pure Haskell regex implementation
>> instead
>> of on a regex-posix / Posix.hsc and the system regex library?
>
> Yes, as I mentioned, ticket 1160
> (http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1160) is for replaci
I definitely think that -1# should be parsed as a single lexeme. Presumably it
was easier at the time to do it the way it is, I don't remember exactly.
I'd support a warning for use of prefix negation, or alternatively you could
implement the Haskell' proposal to remove prefix negation complet
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
Aha. Text/Regex/Posix.hs is generated from Text/Regex/Posix.hsc by
hsc2hs, but this is done on the *host* rather than the *target* when
bootstrapping, and thus generates the wrong results. If you'd run
hsc2hs on the target, then Text/Regex/Posix.hs wo
