| This is a bit disappointing of course, so how do we fix it. There are
| two possibilities as far as I can see. Either don't let float it, or
| have the rule matcher look through the indirection.
This is a tricky one. One possibility would be to postpone full laziness until
later in the optimis
| So it seems to me that NOINLINE should prevent inlining but not prevent
| calling the worker rather than the wrapper. I don't fully understand how
| NOINLINE interacts with the worker/wrapper transform (or I wouldn't have
| been surprised by this behaviour). I'm guessing that it works by doing
|
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:31 +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | This is a bit disappointing of course, so how do we fix it. There are
> | two possibilities as far as I can see. Either don't let float it, or
> | have the rule matcher look through the indirection.
>
> This is a tricky one. One pos
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:44 +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | So it seems to me that NOINLINE should prevent inlining but not prevent
> | calling the worker rather than the wrapper. I don't fully understand how
> | NOINLINE interacts with the worker/wrapper transform (or I wouldn't have
> | been
| But that allows it to be inlined in phase 0, and that's exactly what I
| don't want. I really do not want this function inlined, I want it to be
| a join point.
Remind me why you really don't want it inlined, ever? Even if it's small etc.
S
___
Glasg
Thanks to all ( Stefan, Ketil and Brown). It works both on Linux and
Windows.
Tope
On 6/2/07, Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:00:51PM +0200, TOPE KAREM wrote:
> I am very new to Haskell, and I am using this webpage as a learning
source:
> http://www.haskel
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 14:01 +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | But that allows it to be inlined in phase 0, and that's exactly what I
> | don't want. I really do not want this function inlined, I want it to be
> | a join point.
>
> Remind me why you really don't want it inlined, ever? Even if i
Hello,
This is somewhat related to this thread:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2007-May/012646.html
In that email I asked about the performance of gaussian elimination on
small matrices represented by unboxed arrays, because I noticed that
unsafeRead was unexpectedly slo
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:07:37PM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
> You don't usually compile from within GHCi, but rather from a system
> command prompt. And: the dollar sign is the typical Unix command
> prompt, you're not supposed to type it in.
Incidentally, I find it useful when giving examples o
