Re: GHC benchmarks

2007-10-12 Thread Ketil Malde
Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've also added results from the 64 bit ghc-6.8.20071011 binary > snapshot, which shows some nice improvements, with one benchmark > improving by 30%(!). One difference between these runs is that the ByteString library, on which this particular benchmark

Re: GHC benchmarks

2007-10-12 Thread Ketil Malde
Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not so much code size, but data size (heap size, to be more > precise). Of course. There was some talk about storing tags in pointers for 6.8, I couldn't find the reference, but I wonder if that would help my situation? > It would be interesting to kno