On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:19 +0200, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Can ghc execute compilations in parallel?
> (With GNU make, I'd say "make -j 2"
> but how to achieve this with "ghc --make" ?)
We're also going to try and solve this in Cabal by havi
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:58:21AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | > Absolutely not; quite the reverse. It means that some of the *code* for
> | type functions happens to be in the 6.8 release --- but that code has bugs.
> | It's only in 6.8 for our convenience (to avoid too great a divergenc
Claus Reinke wrote:
- people submit bugreports because they hope something is done
about them
often. Sometimes I submit a bugreport to make sure the issue isn't
completely forgotten, not because it's an important issue to me. (not
really disagreeing, just saying)
Isaac
__
Hi
> So that's part of the Haskell98 standard?
In the Haskell98 standard it can be imported from System, rather than
System.Environment. Nowadays all compilers can use either.
> Nice! So, is it usual for compilers to implement extensions to the
> standard? If yes, where can I find the documentat
On 18/10/2007, Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> > As an Haskell beginner, and considering this may be compiler
> > dependent, I shall ask it on this list.
>
> It's standard across all implementations.
>
So that's part of the Haskell98 standard?
Nice! So, is it usual for compilers
Hi
> As an Haskell beginner, and considering this may be compiler
> dependent, I shall ask it on this list.
It's standard across all implementations.
> How can I access command line arguments from my main function in my Main
> module?
import System.Environment
main = do
args <- getArgs
As an Haskell beginner, and considering this may be compiler
dependent, I shall ask it on this list.
How can I access command line arguments from my main function in my Main module?
Cheers,
--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
Univers
| For actual arguments of f, there is no issue whatsoever with
| decidability. The type checker in my brain uses unification, i.e.
| top-down. The type checker in GHC uses inference, i.e. bottom-up. Why
| inference potentially suffers from non-termination for this program, I
| understand.
Actually
| - the list of outstanding issues for 6.8 branch is suspiciously long. has
| this been reviewed in detail?
Good point, Claus. Lots of people are using GHC for lots of things.
This is a nice problem to have! But it does lead to lots of bug reports.
We have limited resources, so we have
Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Can ghc execute compilations in parallel?
(With GNU make, I'd say "make -j 2"
but how to achieve this with "ghc --make" ?)
Sorry, not at the moment. We implemented a hacky version of it for our
Haskell Workshop '05 paper:
http://haskell.org/~simonmar/bib/multiproc
Hello to all who have given me hints an suggestions about this topic
whether directly by mail or over the mailing list. I do now have a much
more concrete idea of how to optimize my programs.
Thanks for your time!
Bernd
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can ghc execute compilations in parallel?
(With GNU make, I'd say "make -j 2"
but how to achieve this with "ghc --make" ?)
Thanks - J. Waldmann.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
Dear All,
A while ago, I had trouble understanding the coverage condition and I
raised a question on this mailing list. Help was swift and adequate,
especially the reference to the paper entitled "Understanding
Functional Dependencies via Constraint Handling Rules" was very
useful.
However, havin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:33:52AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> >Dear GHC developers,
> >
> >I have tested ghc-6.8.0.20071015-src.tar.bz2 on DoCon and on
> >Dumatel.
> >It looks all right
> >
> >(except the bug-candidate for -O which is common to all GHC versions
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
Dear GHC developers,
I have tested ghc-6.8.0.20071015-src.tar.bz2 on DoCon and on
Dumatel.
It looks all right
(except the bug-candidate for -O which is common to all GHC versions
and which I recently reported
).
On DoCon, ghc-6.8.0.20071015
1) builds the pr
| - the list of outstanding issues for 6.8 branch is suspiciously long. has
| this been reviewed in detail?
Good point, Claus. Lots of people are using GHC for lots of things. This is a
nice problem to have! But it does lead to lots of bug reports. We have
limited resources, so we have t
Dear GHC developers,
I have tested ghc-6.8.0.20071015-src.tar.bz2 on DoCon and on
Dumatel.
It looks all right
(except the bug-candidate for -O which is common to all GHC versions
and which I recently reported
).
On DoCon, ghc-6.8.0.20071015
1) builds the project 2-3 times faster than gh
Dear GHC developers,
The point (1) below looks like a bug (in all GHC versions!).
(1) -O for demo-test.
Take (the public) docon-2.10 build it under -O, install,
and build also under -O its test program by
cd demotest
ghc $doconCpOpt -O --make Main
Either the latter compilation wi
18 matches
Mail list logo
