Hello Stefan,
Sunday, November 11, 2007, 2:54:51 AM, you wrote:
>> Is there any chance of seeing extensible records in GHC 6.10?
> I second this request
+1
--
Best regards,
Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Glasgow-haskel
I misread it as 6.1. Sorry about that.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan O'Rear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 6:55 PM
To: Seth Kurtzberg
Cc: 'Voldermort'; glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Extensible Records
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:35:34PM -05
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:35:34PM -0500, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:
> Is there any chance of seeing extensible records in GHC 6.10? There seems to
> be widespread agreement that the current
> situation is unacceptable, but the official GHC policy is that there are too
> many good ideas to choose from
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:35:34PM -0500, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:
> 6.10? I think that's a typo as the current version is 6.8.1. Or did I
> misunderstand what you were saying?
6.8.1 is released, there is abolutely no way new features are going to
enter a published version. Hence, 6.10.
Stefan
s
6.10? I think that's a typo as the current version is 6.8.1. Or did I
misunderstand what you were saying?
Seth Kurtzberg
Software Engineer
Specializing in Security, Reliability, and the Hardware/Software Interface
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O
Is there any chance of seeing extensible records in GHC 6.10? There seems to be widespread agreement that the current
situation is unacceptable, but the official GHC policy is that there are too many good ideas to choose from - so nothing
gets done! I hence humble propose that http://www.cs.uu.nl
Hi Philip,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
>
> Booting libraries/base
> Booting libraries/directory
> /usr/share/aclocal/progsreiserfs.m4:13: warning: underquoted definition of
> AC_CHECK_LIBREISERFS
> run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
> or see
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:03:05PM +, ChrisK wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] has sent me a new bug report. Apparently he can crash
> ghc-6.8.1 when compiling regex-tdfa-0.93 (darcs under
> http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/regex-unstable/regex-tdfa/ ).
>
> Should I open a ticket for this?
Yes ple
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:16:09AM +0100, Robert Andersson wrote:
>
> ./../includes/GHCConstants.h:1:25: Not in scope: `zd'
Does changing line 36 of includes/mkDerivedConstants.c from
#ifdef mingw32_HOST_OS
to
#if defined(mingw32_HOST_OS) || defined(solaris2_HOST_OS)
fix it?
> I als
Hi Daniil,
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:49:54PM +0300, Daniil Elovkov wrote:
>
> A quick look at the 6.8.1 user's guide reveals some broken links:
>
> 1)
> Obtaining code coverage, pointing to
> http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.8.1/html/users_guide/hpc.html
>
> redirects to http://projects.unsafepe
Hi Christian,
> binary distributions of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger)
Great, thanks!
Can this be posted together with the other binary distributions at:
http://haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_681.html
and also Manuel Chakravarty's Leopard build?
> Warning: this binary distribution does NO
Hi Andrea,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:28:53AM +0100, Andrea Rossato wrote:
>
> 1. the DocBook XSL StyleSheets (probably autoconf related): Slackware
>installs them in /usr/share/xml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets*, but the
I'll apply your patch to fix this.
> 2. "make html" fails for libraries.[3
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
A full binary distribution of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)
is available from
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/haskell/ghc-6.8.1-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
Thanks, it's great you provided a binary distribution, especially
since macports' ghc seems to be
On Nov 9, 2007 4:38 AM, Bjorn Bringert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have this in my ~/.profile so that I don't have to keep giving
> flags to configure for every single thing I build against MacPorts
> libraries:
>
> export CPATH=/opt/local/include
> export LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib
> export LD
14 matches
Mail list logo
