On Dec 15, 2007 2:16 AM, Felix Martini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with Duncan. getHomeDirectory should follow the Windows API.
> There are other unix-style dot-config files in my Windows home folder
> as well. Ideally the ghci config file would be put into
> \GHC\.
Have you installed an
On Dec 14, 2007 11:46 PM, Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds like a bad idea to me. I agree with your initial reaction and
> principle that we don't want to "be baking Un*x behaviour into APIs that
> are supposed to do whatever is native on the current platform."
I agree with Dun
On Dec 14, 2007 11:46 PM, Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can just imagine the bug report and eventually figuring out that some
> application the user had installed had set $HOME and this was messing up
> finding files.
There are not many (there is any, other than perhaps Cygwin?) wh
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:09 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2007 3:53 PM, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> But do you really want getHomeDirectory to return $HOME?
> >
> > Yes!
> >
> > If I define %HOME, it is *exactly* because I don't want to us
On Dec 14, 2007 5:09 PM, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. Unless there are any objections, this is what we'll do.
Thanks.
Juanma
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/
Hello Glasgow-haskell-users,
are you know about http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64 ?
this project was started just a few months ago, but it already
provides downloads to test.
the win64 support is very important for my project so please look at it
--
Best regards,
Bulat
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 3:53 PM, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But do you really want getHomeDirectory to return $HOME?
Yes!
If I define %HOME, it is *exactly* because I don't want to use
Windows' idea of a home directory (which could be perhaps more
accurately def
On Dec 14, 2007 3:53 PM, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can imagine that you might want GHCi to look in $HOME, for backwards
> compatibility.
Yes.
> But do you really want getHomeDirectory to return $HOME?
Yes!
If I define %HOME, it is *exactly* because I don't want to use
Windows
Thanks.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:57:05 -
"Bayley, Alistair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of Seth Kurtzberg
> >
> > Wouldn't an eclipse plug in make more sense? (Unless one
> > exists that I'm unaware of.)
>
>
> http://
On Dec 14, 2007 4:46 PM, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I was recently made aware of "Visual Studio Shell":
>
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vsx2008/products/bb933751.aspx
>
> This is a freely redistributable Visual Studio installer that includes no
> language support, but allow
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Seth Kurtzberg
>
> Wouldn't an eclipse plug in make more sense? (Unless one
> exists that I'm unaware of.)
http://eclipsefp.sourceforge.net/
Alistair
*
Confid
Wouldn't an eclipse plug in make more sense? (Unless one exists that I'm
unaware of.)
--
Seth Kurtzberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:46:14 +
Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Krasimir,
>
> Yes, I'm sure that's true. I suspect the best way is for Visual Haskell t
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
%HOME% is the de-facto standard for Unix-like
shell applications that were ported to Windows and
need a home directory. If someone sets that, it
means they want to use the folder in that way. And
yes, that is the way GHCi has been working until
now, so I think it should
Hi Krasimir,
Yes, I'm sure that's true. I suspect the best way is for Visual Haskell to
add its own configuration sections to the .cabal file, and recognise them
when they are already there.
Understanding the .cabal file is not a problem, but we also have to be able
to modify it, for examp
Simon Peyton-Jones schrieb:
> It's a perf bug in 6.6, happily fixed in 6.8.1
Great news! Thank you!
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
It's a perf bug in 6.6, happily fixed in 6.8.1
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
| Bernd Brassel
| Sent: 14 December 2007 12:59
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Hugs faster than GHC
|
| The following program revea
The following program reveals a performance bug in ghc 6.6
module HCBenchmark where
type M1 a = ()
type M2 a = M1 a
type M3 a = M2 a
type M4 a = M3 a
type M5 a = M4 a
type M a = M4 a -- use M5 for 10 times the compile time and M3 for 1/10
f :: M (M (M (M (M (M (M (M (M (M x)
f = ()
Ea
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 12:00 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
> There are no noddy question (only noddy answers, whatever "noddy" means)
>
I can think of one -- who's the man with the red and yellow car? British
readers of a certain age are now singing along in their heads. ;-)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/14/07, Nicholls, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
>
___
There are no noddy question (only noddy answers, whatever "noddy" means)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New-to-Haskell, i.e. elementary, Haskell questions; extended
discussions
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Mailing_lists
HTH Christian
___
Glasgow-haske
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
The hard work is to integrate it with the new version of Cabal. The
problem is that the configurations model that Cabal employs can't be
easily matched with the configurations in Visual Studio. For the new
GHC versions I expect that the changes will be more trivial.
Cheers,
Krasimir
On Dec 13,
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Alex Jacobson:
>> Will this also work with Tiger or do I have to upgrade?
it will not work on Tiger
> I don't know. I have no box with Tiger to test. Give it a try. The
> worst that can happen is that it is going to complain about some missing
> libraries or sim
Ian Lynagh wrote:
> I'm not sure where GMP frameworks on OS X fit in.
The framework does not fit it at all, because the binary has not been
built with it.
Conversely, a binary built with (some) frameworks can't do anything with
corresponding dylibs. (We haven't agreed yet, if dylibs or frameworks
24 matches
Mail list logo
