Thanks to all, that is the example that i need.
I'll test the example.zip right now.
--
Luis Cabellos
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Christian Maeder wrote:
Dear all,
I've built binary distributions for Mac OS 10.4 (Tiger) based on (better
supported) GMP and GNUreadline frameworks and for Solaris 10.
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/mac/versions/ghc-6.8.2-powerpc-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
On Dec 19, 2007 3:05 AM, John Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lol, I am surprised that the library even compiled without the return
addr;.
But, this definition is correct:
Well, yeah, for some value of correct. It works in this case but it
will most likely bite you if you use it in any
On Dec 18, 2007 8:54 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judah Jacobson:
- Statically linking against GMP puts extra license requirements on
any ghc-compiled program; thus, dynamic linking is preferable.
Dynamic linking is preferable, because it is the simplest way to
On Dec 19, 2007 9:13 PM, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, If you managed to read until this point, you might have noticed
that, due to the monomorphism restriction implied by Data.Typeable, it
is impossible to build polymorphic processes.
Tom Shackell had similar issues with
I've been trying to get a working GHC 6.6.1 build on my Leopard box with
little success. I am trying to follow the Booting/porting from C (.hc)
files instructions here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Porting
When I build the HC file bundle, I get errors about rts/AutoApply_*
Judah Jacobson:
On Dec 18, 2007 8:54 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judah Jacobson:
- Statically linking against GMP puts extra license requirements on
any ghc-compiled program; thus, dynamic linking is preferable.
Dynamic linking is preferable, because it is the
Jules Bean:
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
PS: Moreover, binaries produced by the above compiler will run on
any Leopard box.
That's great news.
Can you add a note about how you achieved that to
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1540
please?
My previous attempts to distribute
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:59:48PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:43:30AM +0100, Bernd Brassel wrote:
Is it already a known problem that the preprocessor cannot cope with the
whole set of possible string declarations?
The cpp is a *C* preprocessor, and if
Here is what I have tried:
module Main where
import System.Process -- using runInteractiveProcess
import System.Posix.Types
import System.Process.Internals
import Control.Concurrent.MVar
main = do
(input,output,err,ph) - runInteractiveProcess calc.exe ([]) Nothing
Nothing
p - Main.getPID
10 matches
Mail list logo
