Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi Simon,
You should be giving a type signature to rewrap! That should fix it.
Thanks, all works fine now :-)
it would be great if the error message suggested giving a type signature
as a solution (or maybe it already does, in the HEAD?)
Isaac
Neil
| -Origi
Hi Greg,
I used 6.8.1 as bootstrap. I have a 6.6.1 so I'll try again with it.
But it is good news to know that it is building on your Mac. Now I
have more hope :-)
Thanks,
Christophe.
Hi Christophe,
On Dec 23, 2007, at 11:02 AM, alpheccar wrote:
Was someone able to build ghc 6.8.2 on
Hi Christophe,
On Dec 23, 2007, at 11:02 AM, alpheccar wrote:
Was someone able to build ghc 6.8.2 on PPC with OS X 10.4 (Tiger) ?
I had no problems to build the 6.8.1 but with 6.8.2, I get the error:
I was able to build 6.8.2 three times on PPC/Tiger (10.4.11) without
error
using 6.6.1 as a
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:36:50 -0500
Alex Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current docs use -i without any arguments to reset the path back to
> []. That is an interesting feature but it is much less useful than
> being able to use shell based tab completion when entering command line
>
On 12/23/07, Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil - who really wants external Core
>
I hate to advertise anything prematurely, but I'm hopefully going to
be devoting some serious time to this starting very soon. (I guess
that stating it here will put more pressure on me to finish it :-)
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 07:35:20AM -0500, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> GHC optimizes less effectively when parts of a program are in different
> modules, or are exported from a module. Therefore, merging all the code
> into one "module Main (main)" would help. Unfortunately, Haskell source
> syntax i
Right now, if you recompile with --make, the exeutable gets a new
timestamp. That seems incorrect. Is this a bug?
-Alex-
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-
The current docs use -i without any arguments to reset the path back to
[]. That is an interesting feature but it is much less useful than
being able to use shell based tab completion when entering command line
options. I suggest that the -i reset feature be removed in favor of
e.g. --clear-s
Was someone able to build ghc 6.8.2 on PPC with OS X 10.4 (Tiger) ?
I had no problems to build the 6.8.1 but with 6.8.2, I get the error:
../../compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace -package-name base-3.0.1.0 -hide-
all-packages -split-objs -i -idist/build/autogen -idist/build -i. -
Idist/build -Iinclude
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:44:23PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
>
> I've built binary distributions
Thanks! All added to the download page.
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:08:50PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> I wrote,
> >Ian Lynagh wrote:
> >> =
> >> The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.8.2
> >> =
Hi Isaac,
I've had similar thoughts before. Once GHC can read and write external
Core this should become a half hour hack. I did a similar thing in
Yhc, and it really is trivial
(http://darcs.haskell.org/yhc/src/compiler98/Core/Linker.hs). I'm sure
there would be a few corner cases, but those kind
GHC optimizes less effectively when parts of a program are in different
modules, or are exported from a module. Therefore, merging all the code
into one "module Main (main)" would help. Unfortunately, Haskell source
syntax is ill-suited to this; for example:
module-boundary monomorphism rest
13 matches
Mail list logo
