Hi Bjorn,
Thank you, that is good to hear. Thank you for giving us the better
API as well.
Frederik
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:03:58PM +0100, Bjorn Bringert wrote:
> Hi Frederik,
>
> I agree with your comments about the headaches of Haskell library stability.
> I made the
> change because it
Hello all,
I am trying to get a working GHC on Solaris Nevada (Solaris 11). I've
tried the binary versions for Solaris 10 made by Christian Maeder. I
couldn't get GHC 6.8.2 to install properly and GHC 6.6 does not work
(it crashes the moment it needs to link to a library). After that i
tried to ma
Hi Frederik,
I agree with your comments about the headaches of Haskell library
stability. I made the change because it seemed like the old library
had no users. I should put my money where my mouth is,
Network.CGI.Compat is now back in the cgi package.
/Bjorn
On Jan 22, 2008, at 18:28 ,
The problem has been resolved.
Kudos to Ross Paterson.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Valery V. Vorotyntsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 24, 2008 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Arrow without `>>>'
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/24/08, Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The right quest
On 1/23/08, David Menendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008 12:20 PM, Valery V. Vorotyntsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've built GHC from darcs, and...
> > Could anybody tell me, what's the purpose of Arrow[1] not having `>>>'
> > method?
>
> It's derived from the Category supercla
