Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
For those interested I figured out how to avoid the RunBreak -returns.
Use RunToCompletion in stead of SingleStep in the application of runStmt.
I guess Interactive-6.8.hs should also use SingleStep.
SingleStep is what GHCi uses to implement :step - that is, it runs
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:13:01PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
[...]
This is due to a change of the configure stage that AFAIK was made to
easy building on windows. Instead, of using shell commands/scripts
(as GHC did previously) to obtain some
hsing-chou chen wrote:
Thank you for porting GHC 6.8.2 to solaris, I am assigned a
job to make sure GHC run 64 bits on solaris. Is your
solaris port 64 bits. Or it only 32 BITS. I know 32 bits
GHC can still run on 64 bits solaris. However company want
to run really 64 bits GHC on solaris.
Bernd Brassel wrote:
Consider the following program:
module Stack where
import System.IO.Unsafe
main = print (sim (replicate 1299959 ()))
sim [] = True
sim (_:xs) = goodStack (sim xs)
goodStack x = fromJust (Just x) --no stack overflow
badStack x = unsafePerformIO (return x)
2ND CALL FOR PAPERS
TRENDS IN FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING 2008
RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN, THE NETHERLANDS
MAY 26-28, 2008
INVITED SPEAKER: PROF. HENK BARENDREGT
http://www.st.cs.ru.nl/AFP_TFP_2008/
The symposium on Trends in Functional Programming (TFP) is an
international forum for researchers
Thanks for your answer Simon.
Simon Marlow wrote:
Bernd Brassel wrote:
Consider the following program:
module Stack where
import System.IO.Unsafe
main = print (sim (replicate 1299959 ()))
sim [] = True
sim (_:xs) = goodStack (sim xs)
goodStack x = fromJust (Just x) --no
