On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Duncan Coutts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 09:08 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> > Geraint.Jones:
> > > Are there well-known differences in the implementations of Haskell in
> > > ghci and hugs? I've got some moderately intricate code (simul
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 09:08 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> Geraint.Jones:
> > Are there well-known differences in the implementations of Haskell in
> > ghci and hugs? I've got some moderately intricate code (simulations
> > of pipelined processors) that behave differently - apparently because
> > gh
Geraint.Jones:
> Are there well-known differences in the implementations of Haskell in
> ghci and hugs? I've got some moderately intricate code (simulations
> of pipelined processors) that behave differently - apparently because
> ghci Haskell is stricter than hugs Haskell, and I cannot find any
Are there well-known differences in the implementations of Haskell in
ghci and hugs? I've got some moderately intricate code (simulations
of pipelined processors) that behave differently - apparently because
ghci Haskell is stricter than hugs Haskell, and I cannot find any
obviously relevant clai
