On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:46:43PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> Hello Serge,
>
> I was looking at the cabal file used to build docon,
> I note the current flags are:
>
>ghc-options:
> -fglasgow-exts -fallow-overlapping-instances
> -fallow-undecidable-instances
> -fno-warn-o
Hi,
On May 29, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, I've now modified the patch and attached a new version to the
ticket:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
*BSD folks please test.
I built the 20080529 snapshot with this patch and my light testing
Hello Serge,
I was looking at the cabal file used to build docon,
I note the current flags are:
ghc-options:
-fglasgow-exts -fallow-overlapping-instances
-fallow-undecidable-instances
-fno-warn-overlapping-patterns -fwarn-unused-binds
-fwarn-unused-matches -fwarn-unu
Dear Haskell users,
we have an automated system that generates executable haskell source
files. These files have a line count from 1,000 lines up to 28,000
lines. There is only 1 type definition and 5 functions in total in the
file.
We now can compile into executable code some of these programs b
There are no rules written down. But the fast exponentiation
algorithm used by (^) assumes that (*) is associative.
I also don't think that fast exponentiation should ever multiply by 1.
-- Lennart
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Serge D. Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01
About the 6.8.3 candidate of May 27,
there remains the question:
why it builds DoCon-2.11 considerably slower than ghc-6.8.2
(3 times, as I recall)
and needs larger -M memory to build this DoCon
?
Regards,
-
Serge Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:34:00PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 05:39:49PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> >
> > This is why res and 1*res are not equivalent in Haskell-98 for
> > res :: Num a => a.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> The library functions assume
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 05:39:49PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
>
> This is why res and 1*res are not equivalent in Haskell-98 for
> res :: Num a => a.
>
> Am I missing something?
The library functions assume that class instances obey some unwritten
laws; it's all a bit vague, but if
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> Hi Serge,
>
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:54:50PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> > This is a bug report for the ghc candidate of May 27, 2008
> > for ghc-6.8.3.
> > A short program example for this bug candidate is on
> >
> >
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 08:08:52PM +0200, Marc Weber wrote:
> > Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
> > before the release!
> Hi Ian,
>
> I haven't done extensive testing, but at least you can start ghci and
> compile simple hello world apps on nixos 64 bit witho
On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:43:22 -0400
Gregory Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/2013/2013.patch
> >
> > *BSD folks please test.
> >
>
> I built the 20080529 snapshot with this patch and my light testing of
> ghci
> showed no problems (FreeB
11 matches
Mail list logo
