On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:31:16PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Ian Lynagh:
> >On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:21:47PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty
> >wrote:
> >>From what you are saying, it seems that one "advantage" of git (in-
> >>place branch switching) is not going to be useful to GHC
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Aug 28, at 22:00, Sterling Clover wrote:
We do have, although not with easy access, an additional declarative
layer "built in" 90% of the time as configuration as type signature.
Sure? I think it's easier than you think: someone's already written
code
John Meacham wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 02:59:16PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
The important thing about Cabal's way of specifying dependencies is that
they can be made sound with not much difficulty. If I say that my
package depends on base==3.0 and network==1.0, then I can guarantee that
