I take back my two recent reports about the effect of -O2, -fvia-C.
Because
1) -O is sufficient,
2) there are too many issues that are more important than the behavior
under -O2 and via-C. So, it is a good idea to save effort.
Regards,
-
Serge Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:25:57AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
>
> >5. The same is for -O2. But this does not gain more performance.
> > -O2 -fvia-C also does not gain more performance, but leads to 7 times
> > longer compilation.
>
> Just to be sure: are you sa
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
5. The same is for -O2. But this does not gain more performance.
-O2 -fvia-C also does not gain more performance, but leads to 7 times
longer compilation.
Just to be sure: are you saying that with -O2 the compile time is ok,
but when you add -fvia-C it take
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Serge D. Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:17:12PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>> > |
>> > | And still ghc-6.8.3 builds itself from source.
>> >
>> > I have no id
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:17:12PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> > |
> > | And still ghc-6.8.3 builds itself from source.
> >
> > I have no idea how -- Happy has been needed for some time. Maybe someone
> > else does.
>
> It's n
