installPackage: internal error: stg_ap_ppp_ret
(GHC version 6.8.3 for i386_apple_darwin)
Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug
make[2]: *** [build.stage.1] Abort trap
make[1]: *** [build.stage.1] Error 2
make: *** [stage1] Error 1
Intel Mac.
I will also r
Judah Jacobson gmail.com> writes:
> Do you have the libedit-dev package installed? If not, the editline
> backend may not have been built. You can check whether it was built
> by running ghci from a command prompt and checking whether the arrow
> keys work.
>
> -Judah
>
I forgot to mention t
Hi Austin,
first of all, thanks a lot for taking the time to report your results!
On 23/09/2008, at 11:48, Austin Seipp wrote:
* The vectorise pass boosts compilation times *a lot*. I don't think
this is exactly unwarrented since it seems like a pretty complicated
transformation, but while m
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Wei Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried it out in Emacs, but ghci always displays some sort of garbage
> message.
> For example, when I ask for the value of 0, I get:
> 0^J0
>
> Is it because ghci switched to libedit? I'm running Emacs-23 with haske-mode-
> cvs
(I'm posting this here in the hope people like Manual and Roman will
see it and take some interest.)
I've built the GHC 6.10 beta (that is, The Glorious Glasgow Haskell
Compilation System, version 6.10.0.20080921) mainly so I could play
around with DPH because it's too exciting to ignore any longe
I tried it out in Emacs, but ghci always displays some sort of garbage message.
For example, when I ask for the value of 0, I get:
0^J0
Is it because ghci switched to libedit? I'm running Emacs-23 with haske-mode-
cvs on Debian unstable.
___
Glasgow-h
Magicloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see So 6.8.3 is not portable
> So in my company-customed-linux box, ghc is nothing to me?
> Any way I can use it?
What kind of machine do you have?
--
_jsn
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow
Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> 2.
>> /bin/sh: test: argument expected
>> gmake[1]: *** [binary-dist] Error 1
>>
>> -e does not work for test under "sh", so I changed it to "-r":
>> ... if [ -r $$FILE ]; then ...
>
> I doubt `-e' doesn't work on Solaris, because `-e' is POSIX. Does
> this "argument expe
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:32:40PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> I've tried to build a binary dist on x86 under Solaris and did not succeed.
>
> "make binary-dist" failed with
>
> 1.
> for FILE in ; do if [ -e $FILE ]; then echo
> ghc-6.10.0.20080921/gmp/$FILE >>
> /export/local1/home/maed
"Yitzchak Gale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
>
>> I think I'll face with the similar problem in the nearest future, except
>> I have far more old system. So I'll be very greatful if you provide the
>> instructions and record your experience.
>
> (Looks like I may need to do
Hi Roman,
Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> I think I'll face with the similar problem in the nearest future, except
> I have far more old system. So I'll be very greatful if you provide the
> instructions and record your experience.
OK, here's a brief summary of what I did.
I hope I'm not forgetting anyt
Ian Lynagh wrote:
> Right now we have the source bundles:
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src.tar.bz2
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src-extralibs.tar.bz2
I've tried to build a binary dist on x86 under Solaris and did not succ
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
> Who can suggest a way to cast from Float to Word32 and Double to Word64
> using ghc? The actual task is that I need to write out the Float as a
> little endian sequence of four bytes and also be able to read it back in.
> The writing and reading are done in Put and Get mo
I am cross-posting this message to several lists.
I had learned the trick before the documentation was updated. It seems I have
used a very unreliable trick. And the "use castToSTUArray" suggested
alternative is a really poor one since I am not using arrays at all.
Who can suggest a way to
* Yitzchak Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-22 09:52:57+0300]
> Before I delete that chroot build environment - could it
> be useful for making GHC 6.8.3 available to others? If someone
> points me in the right direction, perhaps I could create a binary
> tarball and/or backport deb. Or at least r
15 matches
Mail list logo
