This should actually be fixed in more recent snapshots. If it isn't,
please let me know.
Cheers,
Simon
J. Garrett Morris wrote:
My hero! This resolved my problem.
/g
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Mitchell, Neil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
See: http://hackage.haskell.org/tra
Hi,
currently I've got a problem installing from hackage.
using:
GHC (package manager) version 6.10.0.20081019
cabal-install version 0.6.0
using version 1.6.0.1 of the Cabal library
I get:
Building network-2.2.0.0...
Network/URI.hs:128:7:
Could not find module `Data.Generics':
i
Hi,
currently I've got a problem installing from hackage.
using:
GHC (package manager) version 6.10.0.20081019
cabal-install version 0.6.0
using version 1.6.0.1 of the Cabal library
I get:
Building network-2.2.0.0...
Network/URI.hs:128:7:
Could not find module `Data.Generics':
i
Hi,
I've successfully built ghc-6.10 with ghc-6.6.1; there was one minor
problem:
Building extensible-exceptions-0.1.0.0...
Control/Exception/Extensible.hs:2:13: cannot parse LANGUAGE pragma
ghc 6.6.1 does not know about DeriveDataTypeable - I just removed that
line.
Software used:
ghc-6.6.1
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:28 +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently I've got a problem installing from hackage.
> using:
> GHC (package manager) version 6.10.0.20081019
> cabal-install version 0.6.0
> using version 1.6.0.1 of the Cabal library
>
> I get:
>
> Building network-2.2
Hello,
Just writing to let people know the resolution of this problem...
After much frustration and toil, we realized there was a bug in GHC's
handle abstraction over sockets.
We resolved our immediate problem by having our code deal directly with
the sockets, and we filed a bug report,
The basic problem here is that the version number of the network package
has not been bumped. ..
.. Of course that's not true here because the package has
changed without the version being bumped.
..
Indeed the only reason it's trying to rebuild it at all is because the
installed version has diffe
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 20:20 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
> > The basic problem here is that the version number of the network package
> > has not been bumped. ..
> > .. Of course that's not true here because the package has
> > changed without the version being bumped.
> > ..
> > Indeed the only reas
Hello,
I'm currently studying the use of overlapping instances, and I was
hoping to instrument GHC to produce some variety of list of instances
that overlapped. I haven't done any GHC hacking so far, so I'm not
entirely familiar with the code base. Does anyone have any guidance
on which modules
I'm currently studying the use of overlapping instances, and I was
hoping to instrument GHC to produce some variety of list of instances
that overlapped. I haven't done any GHC hacking so far, so I'm not
entirely familiar with the code base. Does anyone have any guidance
on which modules I shoul
10 matches
Mail list logo