Hello,
short followup, when I also removed Cabal from libraries/Makefile
SUBDIRS, then the build has gone well and I'm able to compile and run
simple Haskell testing programs.
Great work, indeed! I'm looking forward to seeing LambdaVM merged to the
standard GHC.
Thanks!
Karel
Karel Gardas wrot
PPS: Why does your mailinglist not set the Reply-To header?
@Roman Cheplyaka: Sorry for double mailing.
Am 13.01.2009 schrieb Roman Cheplyaka:
> > | f x y z = a + b*c + b + fun c
> > | where a = x * y + z
> > | b = c * fun x
> > | c = a * b
> > | fun x = x * x + 1
> >
>
Hello Brian and All,
I'm curious if anyone here attempted building LambdaVM on non-GNU
system. I'm using OpenSolaris/x86 and build fails with:
== Recursively making `depend' for ways: '' ...
PWD = /export/home/karel/vcs/lambdavm/libraries/Cabal
---
* Heiko Studt [2009-01-13 16:15:51+0100]
> Hi (and hello everybody),
>
> I read the FAQ, I searched down till Nov 2008, but did not find anything.
> I hope I didn't miss a FAQ or somewhat. (If so, please apologize!)
>
> My (freshly installed) GHCi 6.10.1 runs on Windows XP on Intel Dual Core.
>
I reproduced the error on my setup (GHC 6.10.1 on WS2003), and received SEH
exception 0xC0FD, which is STATUS_STACK_OVERFLOW "A new guard page for
the stack cannot be created". It looks like something is overflowing the OS
stack or improperly bumping the guard page at the end of the allocated s
Simon Marlow wrote:
I agree with most of what you say - there should be a way to get access
to the history after :trace has finished. Perhaps the right way is just
to have a single global trace history.
Please submit a feature request, with a proposal for the user interface,
to the GHC bug t
Hi (and hello everybody),
I read the FAQ, I searched down till Nov 2008, but did not find anything.
I hope I didn't miss a FAQ or somewhat. (If so, please apologize!)
My (freshly installed) GHCi 6.10.1 runs on Windows XP on Intel Dual Core.
I used the .msi of the Webpage some two weeks ago.
I go
[Redirecting to GHC users]
Andres,
Nice example. It's another instance of a problem that keeps coming up with
type families. Details here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1897#comment:10
The rest of the ticket gives other examples. It's not clear what the Right
Thing to do is.
I agree that's odd. Are you using -O? Can you give us a reproducible test
case?
(The only think I can think is that the line
|Gc{} -> Tm (grspe r)
will build a thunk for (grspe r), and depending on the context I suppose you
might get a lot of those.)
Thanks
Simon
| -
