Hello. I think I've seen other people encounter this problem before, but I
wasn't able to find the solution, if there is one.
I have a very large static list of type [[Int]]. It is 128 lists of 128
integers each. When I try to load the module that defines this list, I get
an error:
ghc: pan
[Redirecting to GHC users]
The <> is a bug. Thank you! I'll Trac it.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: haskell-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:haskell-boun...@haskell.org]
| On Behalf Of Sittampalam, Ganesh
| Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 2:05 PM
| To: hask...@haskell.org
| Subject: RE: [H
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 07:16:31PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> cd libffi && patch -p0 < libffi.dllize-3.0.6.patch
> Looks like a unified context diff.
> Hunk #5 failed at line 344.
> Hunk #6 failed at line 165.
> Hunk #7 failed at line 33.
> 3 out of 7 hunks failed: saving rejects to build/in
Claus Reinke wrote:
ghci-haskeline
This package reimplements ghci using the GHC API and the
Haskeline package for line input in command-line programs.
Just a copy&modify of some of the GHCi sources, including a
Main.hs to call the modified code.
Thanks for the information.
Ok, from the
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 14:57 +0100, Johan Tibell wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Duncan Coutts
> wrote:
> > We need to think about a new better permissions api for the
> > System.Directory module. The current api and also the implementation are
> > at best useless and possibly harmful.
>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Duncan Coutts
wrote:
> We need to think about a new better permissions api for the
> System.Directory module. The current api and also the implementation are
> at best useless and possibly harmful.
Perhaps there's something we can learn from the rearchitecture of
All,
We need to think about a new better permissions api for the
System.Directory module. The current api and also the implementation are
at best useless and possibly harmful.
I've been trying to debug various permission problems related to
installing files with Cabal on Unix and Windows. Half th
manually when debugging. Most of my expriments are related to the
tickets I filled in: checking whether I can have some cheap workarourd
till they are implemented or whether they actually help as much as I hope.
That means that for anything more complicated I need access directly to
the repres
