On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:47 +0900, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:48:13 -0700, Lyle Kopnicky
> wrote:
>
> >Great! But what happened to the time package? It was in 6.10.1. Has it been
> >intentionally excluded from 6.10.2?
Yes, the maintainer of the time package asked for it to
I just noticed that the new 'ghc-pkg check' feature exposes a silly mistake
in the definition of the rts package that we ship with GHC 6.10.2:
$ ghc-pkg check
There are problems in package rts-1.0:
include-dirs: PAPI_INCLUDE_DIR doesn't exist or isn't a directory
...
To fix it, issue this co
2009/4/2 Simon Marlow :
> I just noticed that the new 'ghc-pkg check' feature exposes a silly mistake
> in the definition of the rts package that we ship with GHC 6.10.2:
>
> $ ghc-pkg check
> There are problems in package rts-1.0:
> include-dirs: PAPI_INCLUDE_DIR doesn't exist or isn't a director
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:42:50 +0100, Duncan Coutts
wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:47 +0900, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:48:13 -0700, Lyle Kopnicky
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Great! But what happened to the time package? It was in 6.10.1. Has it been
>> >intentionally excluded from
