Excerpts from Dave Bayer's message of Sat Apr 18 19:05:34 -0500 2009:
> Yikes! You're right. I never noticed, but I never had an 8 GB Mac
> before.
>
> I looked at ./configure for the GHC 6.10.2 source, and realized there
> was already something there. I tried
>
> ./configure --build=x86_64-a
Yikes! You're right. I never noticed, but I never had an 8 GB Mac
before.
I looked at ./configure for the GHC 6.10.2 source, and realized there
was already something there. I tried
./configure --build=x86_64-apple-darwin
and it didn't work. However, it did give me something to Google,
le
That looks great! I wonder what about Mac OS leads to such good performance...
Now if only we could get a nice x86_64-producing GHC for Mac OS too, I
could use all my RAM and the extra registers my Mac Pro gives me :)
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Dave Bayer wrote:
> I'm a huge fan of the rec
I'm a huge fan of the recent paper
http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/new-paper-runtime-support-for-multicore-haskell/
which put me over the top to get started writing parallel code in
Haskell. Parallel code is now integral to my and my Ph.D. students'
research. For example, we re
