Re: Mac OS X 64bit unregisterised port

2009-05-22 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 05:50:00PM -0500, austin s wrote: > > With this unregistered port you've made available, we should be well > on our way to doing this, correct? Right, by starting from that bindist you won't have to do the bootstrapping. Now you "just" need to do a registerised build and fi

Re: Should exhaustiveness testing be on by default?

2009-05-22 Thread John Meacham
JHC has had this for a while, but it calls the pragma 'SRCLOC_ANNOTATE'. It is actually mentioned on this page: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ExplicitCallStack I am not entirely sure whether I will keep the current syntax (it doesn't really make sense for operators), but if gh

Re: Mac OS X 64bit unregisterised port

2009-05-22 Thread austin s
Excerpts from Ian Lynagh's message of Fri May 22 07:01:45 -0500 2009: > > Hi all, > > There is an unregisterised bindist for Mac OS X 64bit here: > > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/ports/ghc-6.11.20090521-x86_64-apple-dar > win.tar.bz2 > > > Thanks > Ian > Hello Ian, I'm currently

Mac OS X 64bit unregisterised port

2009-05-22 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi all, There is an unregisterised bindist for Mac OS X 64bit here: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/ports/ghc-6.11.20090521-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.bz2 Thanks Ian ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http:

ANNOUNCE: GHC porting works again

2009-05-22 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi all, The instructions for porting GHC to a new architecture now work again with the HEAD: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Porting If you get stuck when trying to do a port, then please feel free to ask us on cvs-...@haskell.org or in #ghc on freenode. Thanks Ian _