Dear Simon, et al.
I've looked around trying to pick up information on tiny installations
of Linux. It seems most modern distributions think 200MB is a pretty
barebone installation. There's a claim by someone that (s)he got a Tiny
Gentoo installation into 5MB. I'll be looking into that this
Hi Philip,
Thanks for looking into this!
On 05/06/2009 08:46, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
I've looked around trying to pick up information on tiny installations
of Linux. It seems most modern distributions think 200MB is a pretty
barebone installation. There's a claim by someone that (s)he
Hi,
building ghc-6.10.3 under x86 solaris eventually failed with:
Configuring ghc-bin-6.10.3...
cabal-bin: At least the following dependencies are missing:
haskeline -any
gmake[3]: *** [boot.stage.2] Error 1
I think, haskeline is not build because libiconv is missing:
-bash-3.00$ ./Setup
On Jun 2, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
We'd probably need to find a suitably minimal Linux install, or
start from an existing minimal Linux VM image.
There is a german article [1] how to combine BusyBox [2] with a linux
kernel to get a full (restricted, but small) linux system.
Since there has been little comment on this, my preliminary conclusion is that
no one cares much what the flag is called. So I've left the flag unchanged, but
make the manual mention it in the right place.
If pressure builds to change the flag name, I'm happy to do so.
Simon
| -Original
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Christian Maeder
christian.mae...@dfki.de wrote:
Hi,
building ghc-6.10.3 under x86 solaris eventually failed with:
Configuring ghc-bin-6.10.3...
cabal-bin: At least the following dependencies are missing:
haskeline -any
gmake[3]: *** [boot.stage.2] Error 1
