6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Simon Marlow
The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this: cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal, Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but without cabal-install people can't easily test 6.12.1 RC and we can't test it with Hackage.

RE: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Sittampalam, Ganesh
Simon Marlow wrote: The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this: cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal, Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but without cabal-install people can't easily test 6.12.1 RC and we can't test

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Niklas Broberg
Simon and I favour the RC2 option.  What do others think? +1 Definitely preferable to the chaos that would otherwise ensue. /Niklas ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Troels Henriksen
Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com writes: Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? This sounds about right. There's no reason to not be conservative here. -- \ Troels /\ Henriksen ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Christian Maeder
Simon Marlow schrieb: Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? +1 I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12 and did not test RC1 much. http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749 http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/htk/ Cheers Christian

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Robin Green
At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:15:26 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this: cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal, Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but without cabal-install people can't

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Simon Marlow
On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote: Simon Marlow schrieb: Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? +1 I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12 and did not test RC1 much. http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749

Re: how can I get a listing of everything that's done in a program

2009-10-22 Thread Peter Hercek
Simon Marlow wrote: On 20/10/2009 14:54, Ralph Crawford wrote: So far so good. This is what I want to see - a listing like this for every (interpreted of course) line of haskell code that runs, all the way to the end. Since this is a very large program, at this point I started pasting this to

Re: how can I get a listing of everything that's done in a program

2009-10-22 Thread Jose Iborra
On 22/10/2009, at 12:52, Peter Hercek wrote: As for getting a list of the evaluation steps, we don't have anything that does exactly what you want at the moment, but it probably wouldn't be hard to implement on top of the existing debugging functionality. If you want to execute one

GHC.IO was: Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Christian Maeder
Simon Marlow schrieb: On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote: Simon Marlow schrieb: Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? +1 I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12 and did not test RC1 much.

Re: 6.12.1 release

2009-10-22 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Simon Marlow: Or, we could just make a 6.12.1 RC2, and advertise it with the same caveats, putting out 6.12.1 when cabal-install works and we've had a chance to see the state of Hackage and alert package authors. Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think? I agree. I don't