The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this:
cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal,
Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but without
cabal-install people can't easily test 6.12.1 RC and we can't test it
with Hackage.
Simon Marlow wrote:
The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this:
cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal,
Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but
without cabal-install people can't easily test 6.12.1 RC and we can't
test
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
Definitely preferable to the chaos that would otherwise ensue.
/Niklas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com writes:
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
This sounds about right. There's no reason to not be conservative here.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Simon Marlow schrieb:
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12
and did not test RC1 much.
http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/htk/
Cheers Christian
At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:15:26 +0100,
Simon Marlow wrote:
The current dilemma we're facing with the 6.12.1 release is this:
cabal-install still needs to be ported to the new version of Cabal,
Duncan is snowed under and doesn't have time to work on it, but without
cabal-install people can't
On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow schrieb:
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12
and did not test RC1 much.
http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/749
Simon Marlow wrote:
On 20/10/2009 14:54, Ralph Crawford wrote:
So far so good. This is what I want to see - a listing like this for
every (interpreted of course) line of haskell code that runs, all the
way to the end. Since this is a very large program, at this point I
started pasting this to
On 22/10/2009, at 12:52, Peter Hercek wrote:
As for getting a list of the evaluation steps, we don't have
anything that does exactly what you want at the moment, but it
probably wouldn't be hard to implement on top of the existing
debugging functionality.
If you want to execute one
Simon Marlow schrieb:
On 22/10/2009 11:09, Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow schrieb:
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
+1
I've quite some trouble to port our old code to ghc-6.12
and did not test RC1 much.
Simon Marlow:
Or, we could just make a 6.12.1 RC2, and advertise it with the same
caveats, putting out 6.12.1 when cabal-install works and we've had a
chance to see the state of Hackage and alert package authors.
Simon and I favour the RC2 option. What do others think?
I agree. I don't
11 matches
Mail list logo