Hi all,
I stumbled upon something odd with respect to arrays. I know about GHC not
doing card marking and traversing whole arrays one each GC for each array with
alterations, but still I don't understand the behaviour.
The situation is like this. I am building a compiler. This compiler manipula
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Robert Greayer wrote:
>> There's been some improvement at least in 6.12.1, see:
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2395
>
> Thanks for pointing me to the ticket!
>
> I'm emerging ghc-6.12.1 right n
2009/12/19 Kirill A. Shutemov :
> I want to build ghc for i586-alt-linux-gnu.
Why? :)
> Why do not use config.guess to guess correct host/target/build
> instead of reinvent wheel?
While I sympathize (I gave up long ago trying to use host/target/build
with ghc - we use them by default in Fedora)
Christian Maeder schrieb:
> I think, libgmp.so* should be available under /usr/lib64/ if you use ghc.
>
> There are rpm packages, i.e. SuSE
> gmp-4.2.1-58
> gmp-devel-4.2.1-58
>
> In order to create binaries with libgmp being statically linked in, it
> is possible to copy libgmp.a into ghc'c
I think, libgmp.so* should be available under /usr/lib64/ if you use ghc.
There are rpm packages, i.e. SuSE
gmp-4.2.1-58
gmp-devel-4.2.1-58
In order to create binaries with libgmp being statically linked in, it
is possible to copy libgmp.a into ghc'c libdir so that those binaries
can run on s
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:34 +, Gracjan Polak wrote:
> Duncan Coutts googlemail.com> writes:
>
> > if flag(test)
> > Buildable: True
> > Build-depends: base<5, bytestring, HUnit, directory
> > else
> > Buildable: False
> >
>
> Is this solution good for the time being? I
