Re: Poll: Error message spans

2010-01-07 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Would you find the extra information useful, or just noise? i.e. should we show error spans by default? I certainly wouldn't find it distracting, and I think it could be quite useful in many cases. I vote for turning it on by default. I agree. +1. It is a feature I have always found useful

Re: haddock source link are wrong for haskell98 modules

2010-01-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:13:49PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote: > The link to Data.Time > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/Data-Time.html > in System.Time > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/System-Time.html > is also dead

Re: Poll: Error message spans

2010-01-07 Thread Brent Yorgey
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:01:46PM -0800, Alexander Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > > > Would you find the extra information useful, or just noise? > > i.e. should we show error spans by default? > > > I certainly wouldn't find it distracting, and I think it

Re: haddock source link are wrong for haskell98 modules

2010-01-07 Thread Christian Maeder
The link to Data.Time http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/Data-Time.html in System.Time http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/System-Time.html is also dead. There seems to be a problem with inter-package links. C. Christian Maede

haddock source link are wrong for haskell98 modules

2010-01-07 Thread Christian Maeder
Hi, is this a known issue? All source links in haskell98 modules are dead I.e. in http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/Array.html The link under the first "Source" (at the right margin) points to http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98

Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns

2010-01-07 Thread Bas van Dijk
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Yes I did.  That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out. Ok thanks (I asked just to make sure I don't have to create a ticket.) Bas ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-

RE: Associativity of ViewPatterns

2010-01-07 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Yes I did. That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out. S | -Original Message- | From: Bas van Dijk [mailto:v.dijk@gmail.com] | Sent: 07 January 2010 08:44 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns | | O

Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns

2010-01-07 Thread Bas van Dijk
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least. Thanks, BTW did you fix the infix instance headers problem in HEAD I previously mailed about? regards, Bas ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list