Would you find the extra information useful, or just noise?
i.e. should we show error spans by default?
I certainly wouldn't find it distracting, and I think it could be
quite useful in many cases. I vote for turning it on by default.
I agree.
+1.
It is a feature I have always found useful
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:13:49PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
> The link to Data.Time
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/Data-Time.html
> in System.Time
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/System-Time.html
> is also dead
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:01:46PM -0800, Alexander Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> >
> > Would you find the extra information useful, or just noise?
> > i.e. should we show error spans by default?
> >
> I certainly wouldn't find it distracting, and I think it
The link to Data.Time
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/Data-Time.html
in System.Time
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/System-Time.html
is also dead.
There seems to be a problem with inter-package links.
C.
Christian Maede
Hi,
is this a known issue? All source links in haskell98 modules are dead
I.e. in
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/Array.html
The link under the first "Source" (at the right margin) points to
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> Yes I did. That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out.
Ok thanks (I asked just to make sure I don't have to create a ticket.)
Bas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-
Yes I did. That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out.
S
| -Original Message-
| From: Bas van Dijk [mailto:v.dijk@gmail.com]
| Sent: 07 January 2010 08:44
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns
|
| O
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least.
Thanks,
BTW did you fix the infix instance headers problem in HEAD I
previously mailed about?
regards,
Bas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list