On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are planning to remove the -fvia-c way of compiling code
> (unregisterised compilers will continue to compile via C only, but
> registerised compilers will only use the native code generator).
> We'll probably deprecate -fvia-c
I thought GHC's own codegen didn't do any instruction reordering for the
pipeline. I guess that ends up not being much of an issue in practice?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> igloo:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are planning to remove the -fvia-c way of compiling code
> > (u
igloo:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are planning to remove the -fvia-c way of compiling code
> (unregisterised compilers will continue to compile via C only, but
> registerised compilers will only use the native code generator).
> We'll probably deprecate -fvia-c in the 6.14 branch, and remove it in
> 6.16
Hi all,
We are planning to remove the -fvia-c way of compiling code
(unregisterised compilers will continue to compile via C only, but
registerised compilers will only use the native code generator).
We'll probably deprecate -fvia-c in the 6.14 branch, and remove it in
6.16.
Simon Marlow has rec
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:00:14PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> as per GHC wiki (http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/BuildBot), its
> buildbot should be accessible either on
> http://darcs.haskell.org/buildbot or on http://darcs.haskell.org:8010.
> The first one return 404 page not found an
