On Sunday 03 October 2010 02:10:11, Felipe Lessa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Fischer
wrote:
> > Yes, cabal looks at the package-index to find out the required
> > dependencies, it doesn't know where you have local source files.
>
> Actually, this is cabal-install. If you 'cab
Hi,
thanks to you all for the answers. I will then go with increasing the
version number for testing, this seems to be the easiest way to go.
And indeed, 'cabal unpack' fetches ( ;-) ) the package without checking
that constraints are met.
Gruss,
Christian
* Christian Höner zu Siederdissen [03
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Fischer wrote:
> Yes, cabal looks at the package-index to find out the required
> dependencies, it doesn't know where you have local source files.
Actually, this is cabal-install. If you 'cabal unpack' then
'runhaskell Setup.hs configure' and 'runhaskell Se
On Sunday 03 October 2010 00:07:24, Christian Höner zu Siederdissen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does the Cabal constraint solver always try to solve the complete graph?
>
> example: (ghc-7.0.0-rc1)
>
> $ cabal install parsec-3.1.0
> cabal: cannot configure syb-0.2.1. It requires base >=4.0 && <4.3
>
> cd syb-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/2/10 18:07 , Christian Höner zu Siederdissen wrote:
> cd syb-0.2.1
> * remove base<4.3 constraint from syb.cabal
> cabal install
> * syb-0.2.1 is now installed and works!
>
> $ cabal install parsec-3.1.0
> cabal: cannot configure syb-0.2.1. It r
Hi,
does the Cabal constraint solver always try to solve the complete graph?
example: (ghc-7.0.0-rc1)
$ cabal install parsec-3.1.0
cabal: cannot configure syb-0.2.1. It requires base >=4.0 && <4.3
cd syb-0.2.1
* remove base<4.3 constraint from syb.cabal
cabal install
* syb-0.2.1 is now installe
Hello,
this email below is originally from September 22 so are also the source
code which I comment in it.
Originally this email was rejected being sent from unsubscribed email
address and I noted this just today so I resent it again especially when
seeing the email `Attempt at building on OpenBS
Hello,
I'm attempting to make unregisterised build of recent GHC head on
Solaris/x86 for Solaris/amd64 platform. I'm closely following:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Porting#Cross-compilingtoproduceanunregisterisedGHC
with the only one issue:
mentioned: echo compiler/main/Co
