I think it would help to separate issues.
If it were not for rebindable syntax, there would be no need for these op
fields in (say) BindStmt etc. Instead, we'd have a fixed typing rule for
BindStmt, and the desugarer would use the fixed Control.Monad.(=). The
rebindable syntax thing just
On 29/11/2010 02:05, Wolfram Kahl wrote:
Hello,
with a large Agda development, I have a reproducible segmentation fault
that I have been able to localise to the serialisation
(Agda.TypeChecking.Serialise.encode), which heavily relies on Data.HashTable.
Now I find that Data.HashTable (from
On 25/11/2010 20:01, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
On 25/11/2010, at 10:33, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
Is this a bug, or is the value of spec-constr-count being
manipulated in some way for certain passes?
spec-constr-count decreases for nested specialisations. For instance,
if spec-constr-count
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:29:10PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Ian Lynagh:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:56:00PM -0800, Mark Lentczner wrote:
Outstanding question is what should this framework be called? I would like
to continue to call it GHC.framework, but change the version to
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:05 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
So I've just started playing around with STM and -threaded programs and
I've run into a bug. The bug is similar to [1] except that the file in
question is a Posix FIFO instead of a Bluetooth device. Same behavior:
On 11/29/10 6:36 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:05 PM, wren ng thorntonw...@freegeek.org wrote:
So I've just started playing around with STM and -threaded programs and
I've run into a bug. The bug is similar to [1] except that the file in
question is a Posix FIFO
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:49 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
Isn't that pretty normal?
The blocking for someone to open the other end is perfectly normal. The
fact that compiling with -threaded takes a perfectly working program and
makes it consistently crash I wouldn't call
