Hi Justin, this message might be better on the haskell-cafe list (or
the excellent beginers list!).
When you tried to write the get/put implementations, what problems
were you running into?
Antoine
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Justin Bailey wrote:
> I'd like to carry around some state when
I'd like to carry around some state when rewriting. It seems like
CheckingFuelMonad, etc. are set up to use with other monads but I
can't get the types to agree.
Using MTL I've managed to come up with these types:
> newtype RewriteOnce a = R (State Bool a)
> deriving (Monad)
>
> instance MonadS
Hello,
We now have a git-web instance running on darcs.haskell.org.
You can access it at the following URL:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi
-Iavor
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:26 AM, austin seipp wrote:
> I am also a fan of cgit:
>
> http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/about/
>
> As it's ver
On 17/06/2011 16:42, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:11, Jacques Carette wrote:
they chose to stick to pure Haskell 98. Plan B is actually more fragile in
that respect, in that if they forget to be really really explicit about
their code being pure Haskell 98, the resulting c
On 18/06/2011 11:20, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
As one of the few people who has habitually used Haskell'98 wherever
possible, I favour plan A. As I recently discovered, in ghc 7 it is
already very fragile to attempt to depend on both the base and
haskell98 packages simultaneously. In most cases it
On 23/06/2011 09:54, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:
Is 5 the optimal number of bits to slice off at a time (ie the best
fanout)? It sounds like node copy cost on insert argues for a
slightly narrower fanout. You'll be evacuating / scanning more words
